These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8814635)

  • 1. The influence of occlusal design on simulated masticatory forces transferred to implant-retained prostheses and supporting bone.
    Kaukinen JA; Edge MJ; Lang BR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Jul; 76(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 8814635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strain gauge analysis of occlusal forces on implant prostheses at various occlusal heights.
    Cho YE; Park EJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Heo SJ; Park JM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1034-41. PubMed ID: 25216126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vertical dimension of occlusion in implant dentistry: significance and approach.
    Gittelson GL
    Implant Dent; 2002; 11(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 11915543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On occlusal forces in dentitions with implant-supported fixed cantilever prostheses.
    Falk H
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1990; 69():1-40. PubMed ID: 2196708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mastication forces and implant-bearing surface.
    Le Gall MG; Lauret JF; Saadoun AP
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1994; 6(9):37-46; quiz 48. PubMed ID: 7488751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of implant framework and mandibular flexure on the strain distribution on a Kennedy class II mandible restored with a long-span implant fixed restoration: a pilot study.
    Law C; Bennani V; Lyons K; Swain M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24388719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of occlusal loading location on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: A three-dimensional finite element study.
    Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A; Sevimay M; Soykan E; Unsal E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Feb; 91(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 14970760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
    Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonlinear finite element analysis of a splinted implant with various connectors and occlusal forces.
    Lin CL; Wang JC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 12814307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implant-to-bone force transmission: a pilot study for in vivo strain gauge measurement technique.
    Cozzolino F; Apicella D; Wang G; Apicella A; Sorrentino R
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Feb; 90():173-181. PubMed ID: 30366308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Dental Rehabilitation on Masticatory Function Following Jaw Reconstruction.
    Zhu H; Kang Y; Shan X; Ge Y; Cai Z
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):494-500. PubMed ID: 35727240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Loading of a single implant in simulated bone.
    Rungsiyakull P; Rungsiyakull C; Appleyard R; Li Q; Swain M; Klineberg I
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(2):140-3. PubMed ID: 21479281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of occlusal surface material on peak masticatory forces using osseointegrated implant-supported prostheses.
    Hobkirk JA; Psarros KJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 1289260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated vector analysis to design implant-supported prostheses: A dental technique.
    Tak S; Noh G; Jeong Y; Lee H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Feb; 129(2):257-261. PubMed ID: 34217508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo vertical forces on implants.
    Richter EJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 7615323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shock absorption capacity of restorative materials for dental implant prostheses: an in vitro study.
    Menini M; Conserva E; Tealdo T; Bevilacqua M; Pera F; Signori A; Pera P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(6):549-56. PubMed ID: 24179969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect on Bone Architecture of Marginal Grooves in Dental Implants Under Occlusal Loaded Conditions in Beagle Dogs.
    Kato H; Kuroshima S; Inaba N; Uto Y; Sawase T
    J Oral Implantol; 2018 Feb; 44(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 29135387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vivo forces on implants influenced by occlusal scheme and food consistency.
    Morneburg TR; Pröschel PA
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):481-6. PubMed ID: 14651231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The incomprehensible success of the implant stabilised overdenture in the edentulous mandible: a literature review on transfer of chewing forces to bone surrounding implants.
    Chao YL; Meijer HJ; Van Oort RP; Versteegh PA
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1995 Dec; 3(6):255-61. PubMed ID: 8603169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.