BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8814778)

  • 1. Improving exposure assessment by monitoring human tissues for toxic chemicals.
    Pirkle JL; Needham LL; Sexton K
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1995; 5(3):405-24. PubMed ID: 8814778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human biomonitoring: state of the art.
    Angerer J; Ewers U; Wilhelm M
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2007 May; 210(3-4):201-28. PubMed ID: 17376741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. National exposure measurements for decisions to protect public health from environmental exposures.
    Pirkle JL; Osterloh J; Needham LL; Sampson EJ
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2005; 208(1-2):1-5. PubMed ID: 15881972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of the direct and indirect methods of human exposure.
    Mage D
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1991; 372():443-54. PubMed ID: 1956938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomonitoring equivalents: a screening approach for interpreting biomonitoring results from a public health risk perspective.
    Hays SM; Becker RA; Leung HW; Aylward LL; Pyatt DW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Feb; 47(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 17030369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New developments in exposure assessment: the impact on the practice of health risk assessment and epidemiological studies.
    Nieuwenhuijsen M; Paustenbach D; Duarte-Davidson R
    Environ Int; 2006 Dec; 32(8):996-1009. PubMed ID: 16875734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Population-based exposure measurements in Arizona: a phase I field study in support of the National Human Exposure Assessment Survey.
    Lebowitz MD; O'Rourke MK; Gordon S; Moschandreas DJ; Buckley T; Nishioka M
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1995; 5(3):297-325. PubMed ID: 8814774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evolution of industrial toxicology toward vanishing doses and the human genome].
    Colombi A; Buratti M; Rubino FM; Giampiccolo R; Pulvirenti S; Brambilla G
    Med Lav; 2003; 94(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 12768958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Environmental chemicals in people: challenges in interpreting biomonitoring information.
    LaKind JS; Barraj L; Tran N; Aylward LL
    J Environ Health; 2008 May; 70(9):61-4. PubMed ID: 18517157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monitoring of human populations for early markers of cadmium toxicity: a review.
    Fowler BA
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 238(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 19433102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human exposure assessment to environmental chemicals using biomonitoring.
    Calafat AM; Ye X; Silva MJ; Kuklenyik Z; Needham LL
    Int J Androl; 2006 Feb; 29(1):166-71; discussion 181-5. PubMed ID: 16466536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative interpretation of human biomonitoring data.
    Clewell HJ; Tan YM; Campbell JL; Andersen ME
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2008 Aug; 231(1):122-33. PubMed ID: 18589468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling population exposures to outdoor sources of hazardous air pollutants.
    Ozkaynak H; Palma T; Touma JS; Thurman J
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 18(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 17878926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An inventory of human exposure-related data bases.
    Sexton K; Wagener DK; Selevan SG; Miller TO; Lybarger JA
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1994; 4(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 7894271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling exposure to persistent chemicals in hazard and risk assessment.
    Cowan-Ellsberry CE; McLachlan MS; Arnot JA; Macleod M; McKone TE; Wania F
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Oct; 5(4):662-79. PubMed ID: 19552503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Approaches for evaluating the relevance of multiroute exposures in establishing guideline values for drinking water contaminants.
    Krishnan K; Carrier R
    J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2008; 26(3):300-16. PubMed ID: 18781539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An approach for assessing human exposures to chemical mixtures in the environment.
    Rice G; MacDonell M; Hertzberg RC; Teuschler L; Picel K; Butler J; Chang YS; Hartmann H
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2008 Nov; 233(1):126-36. PubMed ID: 18589469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exposure information in environmental health research: current opportunities and future directions for particulate matter, ozone, and toxic air pollutants.
    McKone TE; Ryan PB; Ozkaynak H
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 19(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 18385670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a screening approach to interpret human biomonitoring data on volatile organic compounds: reverse dosimetry on biomonitoring data for trichloroethylene.
    Liao KH; Tan YM; Clewell HJ
    Risk Anal; 2007 Oct; 27(5):1223-36. PubMed ID: 18076492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing workplace chemical exposures: the role of exposure monitoring.
    Harper M
    J Environ Monit; 2004 May; 6(5):404-12. PubMed ID: 15152307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.