These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8815021)

  • 1. [Antibiotic prophylaxis using cefuroxime in bile duct endoscopy].
    Lorenz R; Lehn N; Born P; Herrmann M; Neuhaus H
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1996 Feb; 121(8):223-30. PubMed ID: 8815021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microbiological examinations and in-vitro testing of different antibiotics in therapeutic endoscopy of the biliary system.
    Lorenz R; Herrmann M; Kassem AM; Lehn N; Neuhaus H; Classen M
    Endoscopy; 1998 Oct; 30(8):708-12. PubMed ID: 9865561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Antibiotic prophylaxis for ERCP: a randomized clinical trial comparing ciprofloxacin and cefuroxime in 200 patients at high risk of cholangitis.
    Mehal WZ; Culshaw KD; Tillotson GS; Chapman RW
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1995 Sep; 7(9):841-5. PubMed ID: 8574715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The change in microorganisms reproducing in bile and blood culture and antibiotic susceptibility over the years.
    Suna N; Yıldız H; Yüksel M; Parlak E; Dişibeyaz S; Odemiş B; Aydınlı O; Bilge Z; Torun S; Tezer Tekçe AY; Taşkıran I; Saşmaz N
    Turk J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jun; 25(3):284-90. PubMed ID: 25141317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bacteribilia after preoperative bile duct stenting: a prospective study.
    Herzog T; Belyaev O; Muller CA; Mittelkotter U; Seelig MH; Weyhe D; Felderbauer P; Schlottmann R; Schrader H; Schmidt WE; Uhl W
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2009; 43(5):457-62. PubMed ID: 19276992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Antibiotic prophylaxis for ERCP: a comparison of oral ciprofloxacin with intravenous cephazolin in the prophylaxis of high-risk patients.
    Davis AJ; Kolios G; Alveyn CG; Robertson DA
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 1998 Mar; 12(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 9570254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiplanar CT pancreatography and distal cholangiography with minimum intensity projections.
    Raptopoulos V; Prassopoulos P; Chuttani R; McNicholas MM; McKee JD; Kressel HY
    Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):317-24. PubMed ID: 9577475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MR cholangiopancreatography: efficacy of three-dimensional turbo spin-echo technique.
    Barish MA; Yucel EK; Soto JA; Chuttani R; Ferrucci JT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 7618543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of choledocholithiasis: comparison of unenhanced helical CT and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
    Neitlich JD; Topazian M; Smith RC; Gupta A; Burrell MI; Rosenfield AT
    Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):753-7. PubMed ID: 9169700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Antibiotic prophylaxis for endoscopic retrograde chlangiopancreatography increases the detection rate of drug-resistant bacteria in bile.
    Minami T; Sasaki T; Serikawa M; Ishigaki T; Murakami Y; Chayama K
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2014 Sep; 21(9):712-8. PubMed ID: 24925282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microbial profile and antibiotic sensitivity pattern in bile cultures from endoscopic retrograde cholangiography patients.
    Kaya M; Beştaş R; Bacalan F; Bacaksız F; Arslan EG; Kaplan MA
    World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Jul; 18(27):3585-9. PubMed ID: 22826624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Retrograde opacification of the bile and pancreatic ducts].
    Ziegels C; Jacquet N; Wahlen C; Delforge M
    Rev Med Liege; 1979 Nov; 34(22):928-37. PubMed ID: 547332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The microbiological impact of pre-operative biliary drainage on patients undergoing hepato-biliary-pancreatic (HPB) surgery.
    Jethwa P; Breuning E; Bhati C; Buckles J; Mirza D; Bramhall S
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2007 May; 25(10):1175-80. PubMed ID: 17451563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective study of biliary cytology in 100 patients with bile duct strictures.
    Kurzawinski TR; Deery A; Dooley JS; Dick R; Hobbs KE; Davidson BR
    Hepatology; 1993 Dec; 18(6):1399-403. PubMed ID: 8244264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Ultrasonic endoscopy in the diagnosis of an abnormality of the biliopancreatic junction associated with tumor of the gallbladder].
    Barthet M; Debonne JM; Klotz F; Sahel J
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 1993; 17(10):766-8. PubMed ID: 8288091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microbiological study and antimicrobial susceptibility of bile in biliary therapeutic endoscopy.
    Gargouri D; Ouakaa-Kchaou A; Kochlef A; Elloumi H; Bibani N; Trad D; Zili M; Kharrat J
    Tunis Med; 2015 Oct; 93(10):602-5. PubMed ID: 26895121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluation of MRCP compared to ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic duct].
    Hatano S; Kondoh S; Akiyama T; Okita K
    Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2874-9. PubMed ID: 9847613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. One dose cefuroxime prophylaxis in hip fracture surgery.
    Kaukonen JP; Kemppainen E; Mäkijärvi J; Tuominen T
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1995; 84(4):417-9. PubMed ID: 8687089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Magnetic resonance tomography of biliary and pancreatic ducts].
    Tennøe B; Stiris MG; Dullerud R; Lunde OC; Aadland E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Sep; 119(22):3252-6. PubMed ID: 10533404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with failed or inadequate ERCP.
    Varghese JC; Farrell MA; Courtney G; Osborne H; Murray FE; Lee MJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1527-33. PubMed ID: 10584796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.