BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8815343)

  • 1. [A contribution to the euthanasia debate: the law and the self-chosen death].
    Nielsen MK
    Lakartidningen; 1996 Aug; 93(35):2915-7. PubMed ID: 8815343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implications of legalising euthanasia in The Netherlands: greater regulatory control?
    Thynne K
    J Law Med; 2002 Nov; 10(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 12497737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Euthanasia: why it doesn't matter (much) what the doctor thinks and why there is no suggestion that doctors should have a duty to kill.
    Bagaric M; Amarasekara K
    J Law Med; 2002 Nov; 10(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 12497736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Euthanasia kits" are prepared for Quebec doctors as palliative care centres rebel on right to die.
    Dyer O
    BMJ; 2015 Sep; 351():h4801. PubMed ID: 26346572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The court upholds a state law prohibiting physician-assisted suicide.
    Feinberg B
    J Crim Law Criminol; 1998; 88(3):847-76. PubMed ID: 12455522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The Netherlands permit active euthanasia. Physician as the angel of death? (interview by Dr. med. Julia Rautenstrauch)].
    Hoppe JD
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2000 Dec; 142(51-52):8. PubMed ID: 11194278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assisted suicide and euthanasia in Switzerland: doctors occupy special position.
    Bosshard G
    BMJ; 2003 Jul; 327(7405):51-2; author reply 52-3. PubMed ID: 12842964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The end of life decisions -- should physicians aid their patients in dying?
    Sharma BR
    J Clin Forensic Med; 2004 Jun; 11(3):133-40. PubMed ID: 15260998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Justifying assisted suicide: comments on the ongoing debate.
    Urofsky MI
    Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 2000; 14(2):893-943. PubMed ID: 12705271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mercy death and caveat emptor.
    Moody BR
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1995 Feb; 84(2):56. PubMed ID: 7891004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A debate on the ultimate self-determination.
    Baginski Y
    Caring; 1992 Jun; 11(6):34-8. PubMed ID: 10145631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bioethics for clinicians: 11. Euthanasia and assisted suicide.
    Lavery JV; Dickens BM; Boyle JM; Singer PA
    CMAJ; 1997 May; 156(10):1405-8. PubMed ID: 9164399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The legal bounds of physician conduct hastening death.
    Cantor NL; Thomas GC
    Buffalo Law Rev; 2000; 48(1):83-173. PubMed ID: 12715817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Oregon's physician-assisted suicide law. An alternative positive viewpoint.
    Goodwin P
    Arch Intern Med; 1997 Aug 11-25; 157(15):1642-4. PubMed ID: 9250223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Euthanasia--a medical responsibility].
    Werning C
    Med Monatsschr Pharm; 1995 Aug; 18(8):215. PubMed ID: 7674986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Should doctors kill?
    Watkin B
    Nurs Mirror; 1975 Dec; 141(24):39. PubMed ID: 11660900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Euthanasia and assisted suicide.
    Malherbe JF
    CHAC Rev; 1995; 23(2):8-10. PubMed ID: 10146189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assisted suicide: a new role for physicians?
    Roehrig CB
    Internist; 1992 Mar; 33(3):6. PubMed ID: 11645728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Demand for medically assisted suicide or euthanasia: what does this mean? View of a physician working in palliative care].
    Mazzocato C
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 2001 May; 121(5):407-11. PubMed ID: 11450202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The alleged distinction between euthanasia and the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment: conceptually incoherent and impossible to maintain.
    Orentlicher D
    Univ Ill Law Rev; 1998; 1998(3):837-59. PubMed ID: 12071210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.