284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8815382)
1. Automatic three-dimensional inspection of patient setup in radiation therapy using portal images, simulator images, and computed tomography data.
Gilhuijs KG; van de Ven PJ; van Herk M
Med Phys; 1996 Mar; 23(3):389-99. PubMed ID: 8815382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interactive three dimensional inspection of patient setup in radiation therapy using digital portal images and computed tomography data.
Gilhuijs KG; Drukker K; Touw A; van de Ven PJ; van Herk M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1996 Mar; 34(4):873-85. PubMed ID: 8598365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated 2D-3D registration of portal images and CT data using line-segment enhancement.
Munbodh R; Chen Z; Jaffray DA; Moseley DJ; Knisely JP; Duncan JS
Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4352-61. PubMed ID: 18975681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A grey-level image alignment algorithm for registration of portal images and digitally reconstructed radiographs.
Hristov DH; Fallone BG
Med Phys; 1996 Jan; 23(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 8700035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Portal imaging protocol for radical dose-escalated radiotherapy treatment of prostate cancer.
Mubata CD; Bidmead AM; Ellingham LM; Thompson V; Dearnaley DP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Jan; 40(1):221-31. PubMed ID: 9422580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of residual error for online cone-beam CT-guided treatment of prostate cancer patients.
Létourneau D; Martinez AA; Lockman D; Yan D; Vargas C; Ivaldi G; Wong J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jul; 62(4):1239-46. PubMed ID: 15913917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic localization of the prostate for on-line or off-line image-guided radiotherapy.
Smitsmans MH; Wolthaus JW; Artignan X; de Bois J; Jaffray DA; Lebesque JV; van Herk M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Oct; 60(2):623-35. PubMed ID: 15380600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Core-based portal image registration for automatic radiotherapy treatment verification.
Fritsch DS; Chaney EL; Boxwala A; McAuliffe MJ; Raghavan S; Thall A; Earnhart JR
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Dec; 33(5):1287-300. PubMed ID: 7493854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Setup deviations in wedged pair irradiation of parotid gland and tonsillar tumors, measured with an electronic portal imaging device.
Bel A; Keus R; Vijlbrief RE; Lebesque JV
Radiother Oncol; 1995 Nov; 37(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 8747940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical Assessment of 2D/3D Registration Accuracy in 4 Major Anatomic Sites Using On-Board 2D Kilovoltage Images for 6D Patient Setup.
Li G; Yang TJ; Furtado H; Birkfellner W; Ballangrud Å; Powell SN; Mechalakos J
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Jun; 14(3):305-14. PubMed ID: 25223323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maximizing setup accuracy using portal images as applied to a conformal boost technique for prostatic cancer.
Bijhold J; Lebesque JV; Hart AA; Vijlbrief RE
Radiother Oncol; 1992 Aug; 24(4):261-71. PubMed ID: 1410582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated 2D-3D registration of a radiograph and a cone beam CT using line-segment enhancement.
Munbodh R; Jaffray DA; Moseley DJ; Chen Z; Knisely JP; Cathier P; Duncan JS
Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1398-411. PubMed ID: 16752576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated seed localization from CT datasets of the prostate.
Brinkmann DH; Kline RW
Med Phys; 1998 Sep; 25(9):1667-72. PubMed ID: 9775371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 3D interfractional patient position verification using 2D-3D registration of orthogonal images.
Jans HS; Syme AM; Rathee S; Fallone BG
Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1420-39. PubMed ID: 16752578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An image correlation procedure for digitally reconstructed radiographs and electronic portal images.
Dong L; Boyer AL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Dec; 33(5):1053-60. PubMed ID: 7493831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Design of a fully integrated three-dimensional computed tomography simulator and preliminary clinical evaluation.
Perez CA; Purdy JA; Harms W; Gerber R; Matthews J; Grigsby PW; Graham ML; Emami B; Lee HK; Michalski JM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1994 Nov; 30(4):887-97. PubMed ID: 7960992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simulation of 3D-treatment plans in head and neck tumors aided by matching of digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) and on-line distortion corrected simulator images.
Lohr F; Schramm O; Schraube P; Sroka-Perez G; Seeber S; Schlepple G; Schlegel W; Wannenmacher M
Radiother Oncol; 1997 Nov; 45(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 9424012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Benchmark test cases for evaluation of computer-based methods for detection of setup errors: realistic digitally reconstructed electronic portal images with known setup errors.
Fritsch DS; Raghavan S; Boxwala A; Earnhart J; Tracton G; Cullip T; Chaney EL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Jan; 37(1):199-204. PubMed ID: 9054896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of out-of-plane rotations on two dimensional portal image registration in conformal radiotherapy of the prostate.
Hanley J; Mageras GS; Sun J; Kutcher GJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Dec; 33(5):1331-43. PubMed ID: 7493858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fast, accurate, and robust automatic marker detection for motion correction based on oblique kV or MV projection image pairs.
Slagmolen P; Hermans J; Maes F; Budiharto T; Haustermans K; van den Heuvel F
Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1554-64. PubMed ID: 20443476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
