These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8816197)

  • 1. Randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews: a foundation for evidence-based perinatal medicine.
    Ohlsson A
    Acta Paediatr; 1996 Jun; 85(6):647-55. PubMed ID: 8816197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Knowledge translation and evidence-based perinatal/neonatal health care.
    Ohlsson A
    Neonatal Netw; 2002 Aug; 21(5):69-74. PubMed ID: 12240460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence-based medicine and perinatal care: from dawn to dusk.
    Keirse MJ
    Birth; 2012 Dec; 39(4):296-300. PubMed ID: 23281948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: Part 2: Randomized controlled trials.
    Manchikanti L; Hirsch JA; Smith HS
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(6):717-73. PubMed ID: 19057624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions.
    Thomas BH; Ciliska D; Dobbins M; Micucci S
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2004; 1(3):176-84. PubMed ID: 17163895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conflict of Evidence: Resolving Discrepancies When Findings from Randomized Controlled Trials and Meta-analyses Disagree.
    Sylvester RJ; Canfield SE; Lam TB; Marconi L; MacLennan S; Yuan Y; MacLennan G; Norrie J; Omar MI; Bruins HM; Hernández V; Plass K; Van Poppel H; N'Dow J
    Eur Urol; 2017 May; 71(5):811-819. PubMed ID: 27914898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The systematic review is the foundation of evidence based medicine. One of the most important contributions to clinical medicine of the past decade].
    Eliasson M
    Lakartidningen; 2000 May; 97(22):2726-8. PubMed ID: 10900892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic reviews in perinatal medicine.
    Halliday HL
    J Perinat Med; 1999; 27(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 10343933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials: the need for complete data.
    Clarke MJ; Stewart LA
    J Eval Clin Pract; 1995 Nov; 1(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 9238566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Generalizability of findings from systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the Leading General Medical Journals.
    Malmivaara A
    J Rehabil Med; 2020 Mar; 52(3):jrm00031. PubMed ID: 32103277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meta-analysis as a tool for evidence-based practice: an example using the Rice meta-analysis of smoking cessation interventions.
    Leonard EE; Wynd CA
    Appl Nurs Res; 2008 Feb; 21(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 18226762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The truth about EBP and RCTs.
    Stevens KR
    J Nurs Adm; 2002 May; 32(5):232-3. PubMed ID: 12021563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Research Pearls: The Significance of Statistics and Perils of Pooling. Part 3: Pearls and Pitfalls of Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews.
    Harris JD; Brand JC; Cote MP; Dhawan A
    Arthroscopy; 2017 Aug; 33(8):1594-1602. PubMed ID: 28457677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?".
    Rothwell PM
    Lancet; 2005 Jan 1-7; 365(9453):82-93. PubMed ID: 15639683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic reviews of surgical interventions.
    Burton M; Clarke M
    Surg Clin North Am; 2006 Feb; 86(1):101-14, ix. PubMed ID: 16442423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evident view of evidence-based practice in perinatal medicine: absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
    Sola A; Dieppa FD; Rogido MR
    J Pediatr (Rio J); 2007; 83(5):395-414. PubMed ID: 17940687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic reviews: the good, the bad, and the ugly.
    Yuan Y; Hunt RH
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 May; 104(5):1086-92. PubMed ID: 19417748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.