These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8817137)

  • 1. Hydrodynamic function of tilting disc prostheses and bileaflet valves in double valve replacement.
    Strüber M; Campbell A; Richard G; Laas J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1996; 10(6):422-7. PubMed ID: 8817137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fluid dynamics of the CarboMedics kinetic bileaflet prosthetic heart valve.
    Baldwin JT; Campbell A; Luck C; Ogilvie W; Sauter J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1997 Feb; 11(2):287-92. PubMed ID: 9080157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hydrodynamic performance of Carbomedics valves in double valve replacement.
    Strüber M; Campbell A; Richard G; Borst HG; Laas J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Nov; 3(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 8000611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative study of the hydrodynamic function of the CarboMedics valve.
    Butterfield M; Fisher J; Davies GA; Spyt TJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1991 Oct; 52(4):815-20. PubMed ID: 1929635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparative study of mechanical heart valves for implantation in mitral position].
    Heiliger R; Lambertz H; Geks J; Mittermayer C
    Herz; 1987 Dec; 12(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 3428845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro pulsatile flow hemodynamics of five mechanical aortic heart valve prostheses.
    Walker PG; Yoganathan AP
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S113-23. PubMed ID: 1389270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Carbomedics and St. Jude Medical bileaflet valves: an in vitro and in vivo comparison.
    Johnston RT; Weerasena NA; Butterfield M; Fisher J; Spyt TJ
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6(5):267-71. PubMed ID: 1610596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro pulsatile flow velocity and shear stress measurements in the vicinity of mechanical mitral heart valve prostheses.
    Woo YR; Yoganathan AP
    J Biomech; 1986; 19(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 3949815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro hydrodynamic characteristics among three bileaflet valves in the mitral position.
    Feng Z; Umezu M; Fujimoto T; Tsukahara T; Nurishi M; Kawaguchi D
    Artif Organs; 2000 May; 24(5):346-54. PubMed ID: 10848675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An integrated macro/micro approach to evaluating pivot flow within the Medtronic ADVANTAGE bileaflet mechanical heart valve.
    Shu MC; Gross JM; O'Rourke KK; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Jul; 12(4):503-12. PubMed ID: 12918854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparative analysis of long-term results with porcine-aortic, bovine pericardial and tilting disc valves].
    Kawazoe K; Kawaguchi O; Kosakai Y; Ohara K; Kito Y; Fujita T
    Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Sep; 90(9):1534-7. PubMed ID: 2586460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical and hemodynamic study of tilting disc heart valve: Single-center study.
    Malhotra A; Pawar SR; Srivastava A; Yadav BS; Kaushal R; Sharma P; Songra M
    Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2014 Jun; 22(5):519-25. PubMed ID: 24646514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of mechanical aortic valve orientation on coronary artery flow: comparison of tilting disc versus bileaflet prostheses in pigs.
    Kleine P; Scherer M; Abdel-Rahman U; Klesius AA; Ackermann H; Moritz A
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Nov; 124(5):925-32. PubMed ID: 12407375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Results of a comparative in vitro study of Duromedics and Björk-Shiley monostrut mitral heart valve prostheses.
    Heiliger R; Geks J; Mittermayer C
    J Biomed Eng; 1987 Apr; 9(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 3573751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental Validation of a Cardiac Simulator for in vitro Evaluation of Prosthetic Heart Valves.
    Bazan O; Ortiz JP
    Braz J Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Apr; 31(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 27556315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The hemodynamic performance of standard bileaflet valves is impaired by a tilted implantation position.
    Hartrumpf M; Albes JM; Krempl T; Rudolph V; Wahlers T
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2003 Mar; 23(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 12614795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative study of the hydrodynamic function of the size 19mm and 21mm St. Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus Bileaflet Heart valves.
    Fisher J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Jan; 3(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 8162222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in vitro assessment by means of laser Doppler velocimetry of the medtronic advantage bileaflet mechanical heart valve hinge flow.
    Saxena R; Lemmon J; Ellis J; Yoganathan A
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Jul; 126(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 12878943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Doppler assessment of mechanical aortic valve prostheses: effect of valve design and size of the aorta.
    Mascherbauer J; Schima H; Maurer G; Baumgartner H
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Sep; 13(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 15473486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The hemodynamic effects of mechanical prosthetic valve type and orientation on fluid mechanical energy loss and pressure drop in in vitro models of ventricular hypertrophy.
    Travis BR; Heinrich RS; Ensley AE; Gibson DE; Hashim S; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 9651851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.