315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8817263)
1. The role of sensory information in the production of periodic finger-tapping sequences.
Billon M; Semjen A; Cole J; Gauthier G
Exp Brain Res; 1996 Jun; 110(1):117-30. PubMed ID: 8817263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual feedback is not important for bimanual human interval timing.
Studenka BE; Cummins DL; Myers K
Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):857-864. PubMed ID: 31982935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of the primary somatosensory cortex in an auditorily paced finger tapping task.
Pollok B; Müller K; Aschersleben G; Schnitzler A; Prinz W
Exp Brain Res; 2004 May; 156(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 15007587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Self-induced versus reactive triggering of synchronous movements in a deafferented patient and control subjects.
Stenneken P; Aschersleben G; Cole J; Prinz W
Psychol Res; 2002 Feb; 66(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 11963277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of feedback from active and passive body parts on spatial and temporal parameters in sensorimotor synchronization.
Keller PE; Ishihara M; Prinz W
Cogn Process; 2011 Feb; 12(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 20306115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is proprioception important for the timing of motor activities?
LaRue J; Bard C; Fleury M; Teasdale N; Paillard J; Forget R; Lamarre Y
Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 1995 Feb; 73(2):255-61. PubMed ID: 7621364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Timing at peak force may be the hidden target controlled in continuation and synchronization tapping.
Du Y; Clark JE; Whitall J
Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1541-1554. PubMed ID: 28251338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of sensory feedback on the timing of movements: evidence from deafferented patients.
Stenneken P; Prinz W; Cole J; Paillard J; Aschersleben G
Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1084(1):123-31. PubMed ID: 16564509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual proprioception in the timing of movements: evidence from deafferentation.
Stenneken P; Prinz W; Bosbach S; Aschersleben G
Neuroreport; 2006 Apr; 17(5):545-8. PubMed ID: 16543823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Time in motion: effects of whole-body rotatory accelerations on timekeeping processes.
Binetti N; Siegler IA; Bueti D; Doricchi F
Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1842-52. PubMed ID: 20227429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tapping with peripheral nerve block. a role for tactile feedback in the timing of movements.
Aschersleben G; Gehrke J; Prinz W
Exp Brain Res; 2001 Feb; 136(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 11243475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contextual effects on force control and timing in a finger-tapping sequence with an accentuated- or attenuated-force tap.
Inui N
Motor Control; 2004 Jul; 8(3):255-69. PubMed ID: 15322307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Coordination of a discrete response with periodic finger tapping: additional experimental aspects for a subtle mechanism.
Wachter C; Cong DK; Staude G; Wolf W
J Mot Behav; 2008 Sep; 40(5):417-32. PubMed ID: 18782717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Timing of bimanual movements and deafferentation: implications for the role of sensory movement effects.
Drewing K; Stenneken P; Cole J; Prinz W; Aschersleben G
Exp Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 158(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 15007586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Timing Effects of Accent Production in Periodic Finger-Tapping Sequences.
Billon M; Semjen A; Stelmach GE
J Mot Behav; 1996 Sep; 28(3):198-210. PubMed ID: 12529203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of proprioception in the control of prehension movements: a kinematic study in a peripherally deafferented patient and in normal subjects.
Gentilucci M; Toni I; Chieffi S; Pavesi G
Exp Brain Res; 1994; 99(3):483-500. PubMed ID: 7957728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Temporal synchronization for in-phase and antiphase movements during bilateral finger- and foot-tapping tasks.
Numata A; Terao Y; Owari N; Kakizaki C; Sugawara K; Ugawa Y; Furubayashi T
Hum Mov Sci; 2022 Aug; 84():102967. PubMed ID: 35687915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Synchronization in repetitive smooth movement requires perceptible events.
Studenka BE; Zelaznik HN
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Mar; 136(3):432-41. PubMed ID: 21300324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is there a link between sensorimotor coordination and inter-manual coordination? Differential effects of auditory and/or visual rhythmic stimulations.
Blais M; Albaret JM; Tallet J
Exp Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 233(11):3261-9. PubMed ID: 26238405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Low frequency rTMS effects on sensorimotor synchronization.
Doumas M; Praamstra P; Wing AM
Exp Brain Res; 2005 Nov; 167(2):238-45. PubMed ID: 16078033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
