These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8817518)

  • 21. Inhibition of auditory cortical responses to ipsilateral stimuli during dichotic listening: evidence from magnetoencephalography.
    Brancucci A; Babiloni C; Babiloni F; Galderisi S; Mucci A; Tecchio F; Zappasodi F; Pizzella V; Romani GL; Rossini PM
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 19(8):2329-36. PubMed ID: 15090059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of the task of categorizing FM direction on auditory evoked magnetic fields in the human auditory cortex.
    König R; Sieluzycki C; Simserides C; Heil P; Scheich H
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():102-17. PubMed ID: 18420183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of tone repetition on auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields.
    Rosburg T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 115(4):898-905. PubMed ID: 15003771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Vowel categorization induces departure of M100 latency from acoustic prediction.
    Roberts TP; Flagg EJ; Gage NM
    Neuroreport; 2004 Jul; 15(10):1679-82. PubMed ID: 15232306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Task-induced asymmetry of the auditory evoked M100 neuromagnetic field elicited by speech sounds.
    Poeppel D; Yellin E; Phillips C; Roberts TP; Rowley HA; Wexler K; Marantz A
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1996 Nov; 4(4):231-42. PubMed ID: 8957564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Stimulus duration influences the dipole location shift within the auditory evoked field component N100m.
    Rosburg T; Haueisen J; Sauer H
    Brain Topogr; 2002; 15(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 12371675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Habituation of the auditory evoked field component N100m and its dependence on stimulus duration.
    Rosburg T; Haueisen J; Sauer H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Mar; 113(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 11897542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cortical sound processing in children with autism disorder: an MEG investigation.
    Gage NM; Siegel B; Callen M; Roberts TP
    Neuroreport; 2003 Nov; 14(16):2047-51. PubMed ID: 14600495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of auditory evoked potentials to acoustic beats and to binaural beats.
    Pratt H; Starr A; Michalewski HJ; Dimitrijevic A; Bleich N; Mittelman N
    Hear Res; 2010 Apr; 262(1-2):34-44. PubMed ID: 20123120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Delayed Auditory Evoked Responses in Autism Spectrum Disorder across the Life Span.
    Matsuzaki J; Ku M; Dipiero M; Chiang T; Saby J; Blaskey L; Kuschner ES; Kim M; Berman JI; Bloy L; Chen YH; Dell J; Liu S; Brodkin ES; Embick D; Roberts TPL
    Dev Neurosci; 2019; 41(3-4):223-233. PubMed ID: 32007990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Temporal encoding in auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields: stochastic resonance.
    Stufflebeam SM; Poeppel D; Roberts TP
    Neuroreport; 2000 Dec; 11(18):4081-5. PubMed ID: 11192632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Timing of pure tone and noise-evoked responses in macaque auditory cortex.
    Lakatos P; Pincze Z; Fu KM; Javitt DC; Karmos G; Schroeder CE
    Neuroreport; 2005 Jun; 16(9):933-7. PubMed ID: 15931064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Time course and hemispheric lateralization effects of complex pitch processing: evoked magnetic fields in response to rippled noise stimuli.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(13):1814-26. PubMed ID: 15351630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Auditory evoked M100 reflects onset acoustics of speech sounds.
    Gage N; Poeppel D; Roberts TP; Hickok G
    Brain Res; 1998 Dec; 814(1-2):236-9. PubMed ID: 9838140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of stimulus frequency and stimulation site on the N1m response of the human auditory cortex.
    Gabriel D; Veuillet E; Ragot R; Schwartz D; Ducorps A; Norena A; Durrant JD; Bonmartin A; Cotton F; Collet L
    Hear Res; 2004 Nov; 197(1-2):55-64. PubMed ID: 15504604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cortical auditory system maturational abnormalities in children with autism disorder: an MEG investigation.
    Gage NM; Siegel B; Roberts TP
    Brain Res Dev Brain Res; 2003 Sep; 144(2):201-9. PubMed ID: 12935917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Magnetic fields elicited by tones and vowel formants reveal tonotopy and nonlinear summation of cortical activation.
    Diesch E; Luce T
    Psychophysiology; 1997 Sep; 34(5):501-10. PubMed ID: 9299904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mismatch field to tone pairs: neuromagnetic evidence for temporal integration at the sensory level.
    Csépe V; Pantev C; Hoke M; Ross B; Hampson S
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1997 Jan; 104(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 9076247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Latency analysis of single auditory evoked M100 responses by spatio-temporal filtering.
    Wübbeler G; Link A; Burghoff M; Trahms L; Elster C
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(15):4383-92. PubMed ID: 17634639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of continuous masking noise on tone-evoked magnetic fields in humans.
    Morita T; Fujiki N; Nagamine T; Hiraumi H; Naito Y; Shibasaki H; Ito J
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1087(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 16626668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.