These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Information and viewpoint dependence in face recognition. Hill H; Schyns PG; Akamatsu S Cognition; 1997 Feb; 62(2):201-22. PubMed ID: 9141907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. EEG phase synchrony differences across visual perception conditions may depend on recording and analysis methods. Trujillo LT; Peterson MA; Kaszniak AW; Allen JJ Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jan; 116(1):172-89. PubMed ID: 15589196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cross-orientation transfer of adaptation for facial identity is asymmetric: a study using contrast-based recognition thresholds. Guo XM; Oruç I; Barton JJ Vision Res; 2009 Sep; 49(18):2254-60. PubMed ID: 19540870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Super face-inversion effects for isolated internal or external features, and for fractured faces. Moscovitch M; Moscovitch DA Cogn Neuropsychol; 2000 Feb; 17(1):201-19. PubMed ID: 20945180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spatial frequency tuning of upright and inverted face identification. Gaspar C; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ Vision Res; 2008 Dec; 48(28):2817-26. PubMed ID: 18835403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do viewpoint-dependent mechanisms generalize across members of a class? Tarr MJ; Gauthier I Cognition; 1998 Jul; 67(1-2):73-110. PubMed ID: 9735537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of divided attention on holistic face perception. Palermo R; Rhodes G Cognition; 2002 Jan; 82(3):225-57. PubMed ID: 11747863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recognition of emotion from inverted schematic drawings of faces. Fallshore M; Bartholow J Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Feb; 96(1):236-44. PubMed ID: 12705532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Face processing in humans and new world monkeys: the influence of experiential and ecological factors. Neiworth JJ; Hassett JM; Sylvester CJ Anim Cogn; 2007 Apr; 10(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 16909230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is it an animal? Is it a human face? Fast processing in upright and inverted natural scenes. Rousselet GA; Macé MJ; Fabre-Thorpe M J Vis; 2003; 3(6):440-55. PubMed ID: 12901715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Visual working memory capacity for objects from different categories: a face-specific maintenance effect. Wong JH; Peterson MS; Thompson JC Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):719-31. PubMed ID: 18675409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recognition of upright and inverted faces: a correlational study. Phillips RJ; Rawles RE Perception; 1979; 8(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 503787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Memory conjunction errors for realistic faces are consistent with configural processing. McKone E; Peh YX Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 16724776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Motion facilitates face perception across changes in viewpoint and expression in older adults. Maguinness C; Newell FN J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Dec; 40(6):2266-80. PubMed ID: 25328999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Information processing during face recognition: the effects of familiarity, inversion, and morphing on scanning fixations. Barton JJ; Radcliffe N; Cherkasova MV; Edelman J; Intriligator JM Perception; 2006; 35(8):1089-105. PubMed ID: 17076068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Cambridge Face Memory Test: results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants. Duchaine B; Nakayama K Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):576-85. PubMed ID: 16169565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]