These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8817798)

  • 1. Meta-analysis in the design and monitoring of clinical trials.
    DerSimonian R
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1237-48; discussion 1249-52. PubMed ID: 8817798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in clinical trials mandated by the advent of meta-analysis.
    Chalmers TC; Lau J
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1263-8; discussion 1269-72. PubMed ID: 8817800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of external evidence in data monitoring of a clinical trial.
    Pocock SJ
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1285-93; discussion 1295-7. PubMed ID: 8817802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of meta-analysis in monitoring clinical trials.
    Begg CB
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1299-306; discussion 1307-11. PubMed ID: 8817803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Classic or Bayesian research design and analysis. Does it make a difference?
    Bloom BS; de Pouvourville N; Libert S
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002; 18(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 11987435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.
    Lewis RJ; Lipsky AM; Berry DA
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 17327241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian random effects meta-analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scales.
    Warn DE; Thompson SG; Spiegelhalter DJ
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1601-23. PubMed ID: 12111922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Borrowing strength from external trials in a meta-analysis.
    Higgins JP; Whitehead A
    Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(24):2733-49. PubMed ID: 8981683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Count on your beliefs. Bayes--not the P value--measures credence].
    Taube A; Malmquist J
    Lakartidningen; 2001 Jul; 98(28-29):3208-11. PubMed ID: 11496808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A meta-analytic approach to determine the state of the science on implant dentistry.
    Proskin HM; Jeffcoat RL; Catlin A; Campbell J; Jeffcoat MK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22 Suppl():11-8. PubMed ID: 18437789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of formal statistical significance on the credibility of observational associations.
    Ioannidis JP
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 168(4):374-83; discussion 384-90. PubMed ID: 18611956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses?
    Thorlund K; Devereaux PJ; Wetterslev J; Guyatt G; Ioannidis JP; Thabane L; Gluud LL; Als-Nielsen B; Gluud C
    Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 38(1):276-86. PubMed ID: 18824467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementing a decision-theoretic design in clinical trials: why and how?
    Palmer CR; Shahumyan H
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4939-57. PubMed ID: 17582801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Roaming through methodology. XXXVI. Likelihood ratios and Bayes' rule].
    Vermeulen M
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Dec; 145(50):2421-4. PubMed ID: 11776667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A likelihood approach to meta-analysis with random effects.
    Hardy RJ; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 1996 Mar; 15(6):619-29. PubMed ID: 8731004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quasi-empirical Bayes methodology for improving meta-analysis.
    Saleh AK; Hassanein KM; Hassanein RS; Kim HM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(1):77-90. PubMed ID: 16440838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating statistics in clinical trials: making the unintelligible intelligible.
    Gilmore SJ
    Australas J Dermatol; 2008 Nov; 49(4):177-84; quiz 185-6. PubMed ID: 18855776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data.
    Sweeting MJ; Sutton AJ; Lambert PC
    Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(9):1351-75. PubMed ID: 15116347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bridging the gap between statistical analysis and decision making in public health research.
    Stangl DK
    Stat Med; 2005 Feb; 24(4):503-11. PubMed ID: 15678414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.