96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8817800)
1. Changes in clinical trials mandated by the advent of meta-analysis.
Chalmers TC; Lau J
Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1263-8; discussion 1269-72. PubMed ID: 8817800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Meta-analysis in the design and monitoring of clinical trials.
DerSimonian R
Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1237-48; discussion 1249-52. PubMed ID: 8817798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Meta-analysis and meta-analytic monitoring of clinical trials.
Feinstein AR
Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1273-80; discussion 1281-3. PubMed ID: 8817801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of meta-analysis in monitoring clinical trials.
Begg CB
Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1299-306; discussion 1307-11. PubMed ID: 8817803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A decision rule for sequential monitoring of clinical trials with a primary and supportive outcome.
Zhao Y; Grambsch PM; Neaton JD
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(2):140-53. PubMed ID: 17456513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of external evidence in data monitoring of a clinical trial.
Pocock SJ
Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1285-93; discussion 1295-7. PubMed ID: 8817802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
Tierney JF; Stewart LA
Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Meta-analysis combining parallel and cross-over clinical trials. III: The issue of carry-over.
Curtin F; Elbourne D; Altman DG
Stat Med; 2002 Aug; 21(15):2161-73. PubMed ID: 12210631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research.
Sterne JA; Jüni P; Schulz KF; Altman DG; Bartlett C; Egger M
Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1513-24. PubMed ID: 12111917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stopping clinical trials early for benefit: impact on estimation.
Freidlin B; Korn EL
Clin Trials; 2009 Apr; 6(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 19342463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses?
Thorlund K; Devereaux PJ; Wetterslev J; Guyatt G; Ioannidis JP; Thabane L; Gluud LL; Als-Nielsen B; Gluud C
Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 38(1):276-86. PubMed ID: 18824467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Controlled randomized clinical trials].
Jaillon P
Bull Acad Natl Med; 2007; 191(4-5):739-56; discussion 756-8. PubMed ID: 18225427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Critical reading of the meta-analysis of clinical trials.
Nony P; Cucherat M; Haugh MC; Boissel JP
Therapie; 1995; 50(4):339-51. PubMed ID: 7482388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Meta-analysis as a tool for gaining knowledge].
Koch A; Ziegler S
Med Klin (Munich); 2000 May; 95(1 Spec No):83-90. PubMed ID: 10851854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bias in meta-analysis and funnel plot asymmetry.
Biljana M; Jelena M; Branislav J; Milorad R
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 68():323-8. PubMed ID: 10724898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A graphical method for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses: application to a meta-analysis of 65 trials.
Baujat B; Mahé C; Pignon JP; Hill C
Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(18):2641-52. PubMed ID: 12228882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Resolving discrepancies between a meta-analysis and a subsequent large controlled trial.
DerSimonian R; Levine RJ
JAMA; 1999 Aug; 282(7):664-70. PubMed ID: 10517720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Clinical decision-making: systematic reviews and meta-analysis].
Fernández Pérez C
Neurologia; 2003 Mar; 18(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 12610756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
