These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8817800)

  • 21. Sequential meta-analysis: an efficient decision-making tool.
    van der Tweel I; Bollen C
    Clin Trials; 2010 Apr; 7(2):136-46. PubMed ID: 20338906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A meta-regression analysis shows no impact of design characteristics on outcome in trials on tension-type headaches.
    Verhagen AP; de Vet HC; Willemsen S; Stijnen T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):813-8. PubMed ID: 18359608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses.
    Brok J; Thorlund K; Gluud C; Wetterslev J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):763-9. PubMed ID: 18411040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis.
    Wetterslev J; Thorlund K; Brok J; Gluud C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 61(1):64-75. PubMed ID: 18083463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comments on 'Sequential meta-analysis: an efficient decision-making tool' by I van der Tweel and C Bollen.
    Thorlund K; Imberger G; Wetterslev J; Brok J; Gluud C
    Clin Trials; 2010 Dec; 7(6):752-3; author reply 754. PubMed ID: 21138922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Trial of Calcium for Preeclampsia Prevention (CPEP): rationale, design, and methods.
    Levine RJ; Esterlitz JR; Raymond EG; DerSimonian R; Hauth JC; Ben Curet L; Sibai BM; Catalano PM; Morris CD; Clemens JD; Ewell MG; Friedman SA; Goldenberg RL; Jacobson SL; Joffe GM; Klebanoff MA; Petrulis AS; Rigau-Perez JG
    Control Clin Trials; 1996 Oct; 17(5):442-69. PubMed ID: 8932976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. On the importance of heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Keefe SM; Strom BL
    Clin Trials; 2009 Oct; 6(5):443-4; discussion 445. PubMed ID: 19846896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Lessons learned from large-scale clinical trials.
    Deykin D
    Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc; 1991; 102():96-104; discussion 104-5. PubMed ID: 2151835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Cumulative meta-analysis as ultimate truth].
    Rosendaal FR; van Everdingen JJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Aug; 137(32):1591-4. PubMed ID: 8366958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical trials and meta-analysis. What do they do for us?
    Kassirer JP
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Jul; 327(4):273-4. PubMed ID: 1614470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Meta-analytic stimulus for changes in clinical trials.
    Chalmers TC; Lau J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1993; 2(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 8261256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A note regarding meta-analysis of sequential trials with stopping for efficacy.
    Senn S
    Pharm Stat; 2014; 13(6):371-5. PubMed ID: 25296692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Can meta-analyses be trusted?
    Thompson SG; Pocock SJ
    Lancet; 1991 Nov; 338(8775):1127-30. PubMed ID: 1682553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Considering selection bias when developing a search strategy.
    Nakao YM; Ueshima K; Teramukai S; Tanaka S; Yasuno S; Fujimoto A; Kawakami K; Nakao K
    Arch Intern Med; 2011 Mar; 171(5):471-2; author reply 472-3. PubMed ID: 21403047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Would clinical nutrition benefit from meta-analyses and trials registers?
    Garrow JS
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1992 Dec; 46(12):843-5. PubMed ID: 1483412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Two cheers for meta-analysis: problems and opportunities in aggregating results of clinical trials.
    Naylor CD
    CMAJ; 1988 May; 138(10):891-5. PubMed ID: 3365624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Are meta-analyses reliable?].
    Piedbois P; Buyse M
    Rev Prat; 1994 Nov; 44(18):2401-3. PubMed ID: 7855496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Meta-analytic tools for medical decision making: a practical guide.
    Hasselblad V; McCrory DC
    Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(1):81-96. PubMed ID: 7898302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical trials: to terminate or not to terminate.
    Gossage JR
    Ann Intern Med; 1992 Apr; 116(8):699; author reply 700. PubMed ID: 1546877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.