These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8817905)

  • 1. Reduced frequency selectivity and the preservation of spectral contrast in noise.
    Leek MR; Summers V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Sep; 100(3):1796-806. PubMed ID: 8817905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimum spectral contrast for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Leek MR; Dorman MF; Summerfield Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jan; 81(1):148-54. PubMed ID: 3819173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perception of spectral contrast by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dreisbach LE; Leek MR; Lentz JJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Aug; 48(4):910-21. PubMed ID: 16378482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory filter shapes of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners in continuous broadband noise.
    Leek MR; Summers V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Dec; 94(6):3127-37. PubMed ID: 8300951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency glide discrimination in the F2 region by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Summers V; Leek MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jun; 97(6):3825-32. PubMed ID: 7790660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The internal representation of spectral contrast in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Summers V; Leek MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jun; 95(6):3518-28. PubMed ID: 8046143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Residual frequency selectivity in the profoundly hearing-impaired listener.
    Faulkner A; Rosen S; Moore BC
    Br J Audiol; 1990 Dec; 24(6):381-92. PubMed ID: 2279196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of signal level and spectral contrast on vowel formant discrimination for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Woodall A; Liu C
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):94-104. PubMed ID: 23221306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vowel identification by amplitude and phase contrast.
    Molis MR; Diedesch A; Gallun F; Leek MR
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 14(1):125-37. PubMed ID: 23007720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spectral-peak selection in spectral-shape discrimination by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Lentz JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Aug; 120(2):945-56. PubMed ID: 16938982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vowel identification by listeners with hearing impairment in response to variation in formant frequencies.
    Molis MR; Leek MR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Aug; 54(4):1211-23. PubMed ID: 21297168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Impairment on Asynchronous Glimpsing of Speech.
    Ozmeral EJ; Buss E; Hall JW
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154920. PubMed ID: 27144601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of temporal waveform shape on spectral discrimination by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Leek MR; Summers V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Oct; 94(4):2074-82. PubMed ID: 8227749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effect of Cochlear Damage on the Sensitivity to Harmonicity.
    Bonnard D; Dauman R; Semal C; Demany L
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 27992390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Limited resolution of spectral contrast and hearing loss for speech in noise.
    ter Keurs M; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Sep; 94(3 Pt 1):1307-14. PubMed ID: 8408972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Rhebergen KS; Lyzenga J; Dreschler WA; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1570-83. PubMed ID: 20329857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory filter shapes in normal-hearing, noise-masked normal, and elderly listeners.
    Sommers MS; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 May; 93(5):2903-14. PubMed ID: 8315154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21. PubMed ID: 1597602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.