These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8817905)

  • 21. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Amos NE; Humes LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A psychophysical evaluation of spectral enhancement.
    DiGiovanni JJ; Nelson PB; Schlauch RS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1121-35. PubMed ID: 16411801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Loizou PC; Poroy O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1619-27. PubMed ID: 11572371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Intraspeech spread of masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Summers V; Leek MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 May; 101(5 Pt 1):2866-76. PubMed ID: 9165738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. On the Pitch Strength of Bandpass Noise in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Horbach M; Verhey JL; Hots J
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518787067. PubMed ID: 30009682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Consequences of broad auditory filters for identification of multichannel-compressed vowels.
    Souza P; Wright R; Bor S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Apr; 55(2):474-86. PubMed ID: 22207696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.
    Strelcyk O; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3328-45. PubMed ID: 19425674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spectral enhancement to improve the intelligibility of speech in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Simpson AM; Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():101-7. PubMed ID: 2356717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Speech perception in low-pass filtered noise for normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Lewis DE; Kelly WJ; Jesteadt W
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):290-7. PubMed ID: 2359269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of intensity perturbations on speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    van Schijndel NH; Houtgast T; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2202-10. PubMed ID: 11386571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perceptual organization of sequential stimuli in listeners with cochlear hearing loss.
    Grose JH; Hall JW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Dec; 39(6):1149-58. PubMed ID: 8959600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Speech Masking in Normal and Impaired Hearing: Interactions Between Frequency Selectivity and Inherent Temporal Fluctuations in Noise.
    Oxenham AJ; Kreft HA
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():125-132. PubMed ID: 27080653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Factors affecting vowel formant discrimination by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Liu C; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2855-64. PubMed ID: 18189575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Clinical study of speech understanding in noise].
    Tremblay C; Picard M; Barbarosie T; Banville R
    Audiology; 1991; 30(4):212-40. PubMed ID: 1755750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on formant-frequency discrimination: Measurements and models.
    Carney LH; Cameron DA; Kinast KB; Feld CE; Schwarz DM; Leong UC; McDonough JM
    Hear Res; 2023 Aug; 435():108788. PubMed ID: 37224720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Turner CW; Souza PE; Forget LN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2568-76. PubMed ID: 7714274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Human Frequency Following Response: Neural Representation of Envelope and Temporal Fine Structure in Listeners with Normal Hearing and Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Krishnan A; Bartlett E
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):e91-e103. PubMed ID: 26583482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Binaural pitch perception in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Santurette S; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):29-47. PubMed ID: 17107767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Temporal intraspeech masking of plosive bursts: effects of hearing loss and frequency shaping.
    Mackersie CL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 50(3):554-63. PubMed ID: 17538099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The responses of models of "high-spontaneous" auditory-nerve fibers in a damaged cochlea to speech syllables in noise.
    Geisler CD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Dec; 86(6):2192-205. PubMed ID: 2600310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.