These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8817907)

  • 1. Frequency dependence of acoustic backscatter from 5 to 65 MHz (0.06 < ka < 4.0) of polystyrene beads in agarose.
    Bridal SL; Wallace KD; Trousil RL; Wickline SA; Miller JG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Sep; 100(3):1841-8. PubMed ID: 8817907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-frequency backscatter and attenuation measurements of porcine erythrocyte suspensions between 30-90 MHz.
    Maruvada S; Shung KK; Wang SH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002 Aug; 28(8):1081-8. PubMed ID: 12217444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrasonic characterization of human cancellous bone in vitro using three different apparent backscatter parameters in the frequency range 0.6-15.0 mhz.
    Hoffmeister BK; Johnson DP; Janeski JA; Keedy DA; Steinert BW; Viano AM; Kaste SC
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Jul; 55(7):1442-52. PubMed ID: 18986933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A proposed microscopic elastic wave theory for ultrasonic backscatter from myocardial tissue.
    Rose JH; Kaufmann MR; Wickline SA; Hall CS; Miller JG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jan; 97(1):656-68. PubMed ID: 7860840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-frequency ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter coefficients of in vivo normal human dermis and subcutaneous fat.
    Raju BI; Srinivasan MA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 27(11):1543-56. PubMed ID: 11750754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short-pulse method for acoustic backscatter amplitude calibration at MHz frequencies.
    Wilson GW; Hay AE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Sep; 142(3):1655. PubMed ID: 28964085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multispectral and multiangle measurements of acoustic seabed backscatter acquired with a tilted calibrated echosounder.
    Fezzani R; Berger L; le Bouffant N; Fonseca L; Lurton X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Jun; 149(6):4503. PubMed ID: 34241471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustic characterization of echogenic liposomes: frequency-dependent attenuation and backscatter.
    Kopechek JA; Haworth KJ; Raymond JL; Douglas Mast T; Perrin SR; Klegerman ME; Huang S; Porter TM; McPherson DD; Holland CK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3472-81. PubMed ID: 22088022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Absolute backscatter coefficient estimates of tissue-mimicking phantoms in the 5-50 MHz frequency range.
    McCormick MM; Madsen EL; Deaner ME; Varghese T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):737-43. PubMed ID: 21877789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the concentration dependence of sound attenuation in aqueous suspensions of silt- and sand-sized sediment: A compilation and analysis of the available data.
    Hare J; Hay AE
    JASA Express Lett; 2022 Mar; 2(3):036002. PubMed ID: 36154624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influences of ultrasonic machine settings, transducer frequency and placement of region of interest on the measurement of integrated backscatter and cyclic variation.
    Ota T; Craig DM; Kisslo J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1997; 23(7):1059-70. PubMed ID: 9330449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interlaboratory comparison of ultrasonic backscatter coefficient measurements from 2 to 9 MHz.
    Wear KA; Stiles TA; Frank GR; Madsen EL; Cheng F; Feleppa EJ; Hall CS; Kim BS; Lee P; O'Brien WD; Oelze ML; Raju BI; Shung KK; Wilson TA; Yuan JR
    J Ultrasound Med; 2005 Sep; 24(9):1235-50. PubMed ID: 16123184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Numerical analysis for transverse microbead trapping using 30 MHz focused ultrasound in ray acoustics regime.
    Lee J
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Jan; 54(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 23809757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding the limitations of ultrasonic backscatter measurements from microbubble populations.
    Sboros V; Ramnarine KV; Moran CM; Pye SD; McDicken WN
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Dec; 47(23):4287-99. PubMed ID: 12502050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High frequency ultrasonic backscatter from erythrocyte suspension.
    Kuo IY; Shung KK
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1994 Jan; 41(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 8200665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The acoustic properties, centered on 20 MHZ, of an IEC agar-based tissue-mimicking material and its temperature, frequency and age dependence.
    Brewin MP; Pike LC; Rowland DE; Birch MJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1292-306. PubMed ID: 18343021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Backscatter coefficient estimation using array transducers.
    Insana MF; Hall TJ; Cook LT
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1994; 41(5):714-23. PubMed ID: 18263260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anisotropy of the apparent frequency dependence of backscatter in formalin fixed human myocardium.
    Hall CS; Verdonk ED; Wickline SA; Perez JE; Miller JG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jan; 101(1):563-8. PubMed ID: 9000744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiation force on a spherical object in an axisymmetric wave field and its application to the calibration of high-frequency transducers.
    Chen X; Apfel RE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Feb; 99(2):713-24. PubMed ID: 8609305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contraction-related variation in frequency dependence of acoustic properties of canine myocardium.
    Wear KA; Milunski MR; Wickline SA; Perez JE; Sobel BE; Miller JG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Dec; 86(6):2067-72. PubMed ID: 2689494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.