142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8819370)
1. Analysis of interobserver and intraobserver variability in CT tumor measurements.
Hopper KD; Kasales CJ; Van Slyke MA; Schwartz TA; TenHave TR; Jozefiak JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Oct; 167(4):851-4. PubMed ID: 8819370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraobserver and interobserver variability in computed tomography size and attenuation measurements in patients with renal cell carcinoma receiving antiangiogenic therapy: implications for alternative response criteria.
Krajewski KM; Nishino M; Franchetti Y; Ramaiya NH; Van den Abbeele AD; Choueiri TK
Cancer; 2014 Mar; 120(5):711-21. PubMed ID: 24264883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcinoma lung lesions: implications for assessment of tumor response.
Erasmus JJ; Gladish GW; Broemeling L; Sabloff BS; Truong MT; Herbst RS; Munden RF
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jul; 21(13):2574-82. PubMed ID: 12829678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chest staging in testis cancer patients: imaging modality selection based upon risk assessment as determined by abdominal computerized tomography scan results.
See WA; Hoxie L
J Urol; 1993 Sep; 150(3):874-8. PubMed ID: 8345604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraobserver and interobserver variability in GTV delineation on FDG-PET-CT images of head and neck cancers.
Breen SL; Publicover J; De Silva S; Pond G; Brock K; O'Sullivan B; Cummings B; Dawson L; Keller A; Kim J; Ringash J; Yu E; Hendler A; Waldron J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Jul; 68(3):763-70. PubMed ID: 17379435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interobserver variability in measuring the dimensions of the abdominal aorta: comparison of ultrasound and computed tomography.
Jaakkola P; Hippeläinen M; Farin P; Rytkönen H; Kainulainen S; Partanen K
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1996 Aug; 12(2):230-7. PubMed ID: 8760988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Eliminating unenhanced CT when evaluating abdominal neoplasms in children.
da Costa e Silva EJ; da Silva GA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Nov; 189(5):1211-4. PubMed ID: 17954663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interobserver variability in determining enhancement of renal masses on helical CT.
Siegel CL; Fisher AJ; Bennett HF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 May; 172(5):1207-12. PubMed ID: 10227490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metastatic lobular carcinoma of the breast: patterns of spread in the chest, abdomen, and pelvis on CT.
Winston CB; Hadar O; Teitcher JB; Caravelli JF; Sklarin NT; Panicek DM; Liberman L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Sep; 175(3):795-800. PubMed ID: 10954469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability and agreement between fine-cut CT scans and plain radiography in the evaluation of posterolateral fusions.
Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Djurasovic M
Spine J; 2007; 7(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 17197331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Volumetrical measurements in vestibular schwannoma, the influence of slice thickness and patient's repositioning.
Luppino FS; Grooters E; de Bruïne FT; Zwinderman AH; van der Mey AG
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Oct; 27(7):962-8. PubMed ID: 17006347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tumour size measurement in an oncology clinical trial: comparison between off-site and on-site measurements.
Belton AL; Saini S; Liebermann K; Boland GW; Halpern EF
Clin Radiol; 2003 Apr; 58(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 12662953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Metastatic cáncer presentation. Validation of a diagnostic algorithm with 221 consecutive patients].
Losa Gaspà F; Germá JR; Albareda JM; Fernández-Ortega A; Sanjosé S; Fernández Trigo V
Rev Clin Esp; 2002 Jun; 202(6):313-9. PubMed ID: 12093395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging of oncologic patients: benefit of combined CT and FDG PET in the diagnosis of malignancy.
Eubank WB; Mankoff DA; Schmiedl UP; Winter TC; Fisher ER; Olshen AB; Graham MM; Eary JF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Oct; 171(4):1103-10. PubMed ID: 9763005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast-enhanced helical CT for pulmonary embolism detection: inter- and intraobserver agreement among radiologists with variable experience.
Chartrand-Lefebvre C; Howarth N; Lucidarme O; Beigelman C; Cluzel P; Mourey-Gérosa I; Cadi M; Grenier P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jan; 172(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 9888748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparative study of tumor evaluation with computerized tomography and surgery in ovarian cancer].
Taïeb S; Bonodeau F; Leblanc E; Vennin P; Fournier C; Besson P
J Radiol; 1998 Jan; 79(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 9757217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intervention to Reduce Interobserver Variability in Computed Tomographic Measurement of Cancer Lesions Among Experienced Radiologists.
Woo M; Lowe SC; Devane AM; Gimbel RW
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2021; 50(3):321-327. PubMed ID: 32014355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of chest CT in the follow-up of ovarian adenocarcinoma.
Dachman AH; Visweswaran A; Battula R; Jameel S; Waggoner SE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Mar; 176(3):701-5. PubMed ID: 11222208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interobserver and intraobserver variability of RECIST assessment in ovarian cancer.
Krasovitsky M; Lee YC; Sim HW; Chawla T; Moore H; Moses D; Baker L; Mandel C; Kielar A; Hartery A; O'Malley M; Friedlander M; Oza AM; Wang L; Lheureux S; Wilson M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2022 May; 32(5):656-661. PubMed ID: 35379690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Helical computed tomography at 1.5:1 pitch reconstructed at 15-mm and 7-mm intervals for examination of patients with suspected metastatic disease.
Olson MC; Posniak HV; Demos TC; Pierce KL; Lawson TL
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1996 Feb; 47(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 8548471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
