These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8819597)
61. Intellectual property. University licensing and the Bayh-Dole Act. Thursby JG; Thursby MC Science; 2003 Aug; 301(5636):1052. PubMed ID: 12933996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. Patenting life forms and preserving human values. Lisson EL Hosp Prog; 1981 Jan; 62(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 10289283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. International conflicts over patenting human DNA sequences in the United States and the European Union: an argument for compulsory licensing and a fair-use exemption. Gitter DM N Y Univ Law Rev; 2001 Dec; 76(6):1623-91. PubMed ID: 12741387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. The patenting of medical treatment. Loughlan PL Med J Aust; 1995 Apr; 162(7):376-7, 380. PubMed ID: 7715522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. The usefulness of method patents for surgical procedures. Longacre JR; Rosenberg R; Gewertz BL Ann Vasc Surg; 1996 Jan; 10(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 8688289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. Is a poster presentation really a "printed publication"? Adams BK; Pabst P Tissue Eng; 2004; 10(11-12):1841-2. PubMed ID: 15684692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. Excerpts from a National Conference on Recombinant DNA and the Federal Government. Future impacts of patentability. Dunner DR Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1981 Jul; 4(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 7255758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. The legal impact of patient materials used for product development in the biomedical industry. Wagner AB Clin Res; 1985 Oct; 33(4):444-7. PubMed ID: 4053501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. The dispersion of genetic technologies and the law. Clayton EW Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(3):S13-5. PubMed ID: 7649733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Disease genes are not patentable: a rebuttal of McGee. Merz JF; Cho MK Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1998; 7(4):425-8. PubMed ID: 9752584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. [Medical research and ethics committees]. Pfeiffer G; Tiedemann IK Med Klin (Munich); 1989 Nov; 84(11):557-61. PubMed ID: 2687677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. Ethics, money, and the human genome. Carey NH BMJ; 1992 Mar; 304(6829):725-6. PubMed ID: 1571671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. Ethics. Advertising your services--a question of propriety. Korcok M Can Med Assoc J; 1981 Nov; 125(9):1026, 1028, 1033. PubMed ID: 7332889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. Animal patents. Australian law finds balance. Ewing T Nature; 1990 Sep; 347(6291):320. PubMed ID: 2215637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. [A physician is sued for giving good care! The Medical Society in the USA condemns patents on therapeutic methods]. Bergström L Lakartidningen; 1995 Aug; 92(34):2966, 2971. PubMed ID: 7650975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. France and Council of Europe against gene-patenting law. Ann Oncol; 2000 Aug; 11(8):903-4. PubMed ID: 11038020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. Patenting EPO analogs: screening vs. predictability. Kelly P Biotechnology (N Y); 1990 Feb; 8(2):112-3. PubMed ID: 1366357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]