These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8820029)

  • 1. Speech perception of temporally reversed syllables by normally hearing adults.
    Li AC; Boothroyd A
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1996 Jan; 57(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 8820029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unified Coding of Spectral and Temporal Phonetic Cues: Electrophysiological Evidence for Abstract Phonological Features.
    Monahan PJ; Schertz J; Fu Z; Pérez A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Mar; 34(4):618-638. PubMed ID: 35061026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual-motor processing of phonetic features in speech.
    Gordon PC; Meyer DE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Apr; 10(2):153-78. PubMed ID: 6232338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cortical neural activity underlying speech perception in postlingual adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Henkin Y; Tetin-Schneider S; Hildesheimer M; Kishon-Rabin L
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 18781063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The emergence of phonetic segments: evidence from the spectral structure of fricative-vowel syllables spoken by children and adults.
    Nittrouer S; Studdert-Kennedy M; McGowan RS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Mar; 32(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 2704187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phonetic perceptual identification by native- and second-language speakers differentially activates brain regions involved with acoustic phonetic processing and those involved with articulatory-auditory/orosensory internal models.
    Callan DE; Jones JA; Callan AM; Akahane-Yamada R
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jul; 22(3):1182-94. PubMed ID: 15219590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An on-line imitative test of speech-pattern contrast perception (OlimSpac): developmental effects in normally hearing children.
    Boothroyd A; Eisenberg LS; Martinez AS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 53(3):531-42. PubMed ID: 20220029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity to Phonological Universals: The Case of Stops and Fricatives.
    Tamási K; Berent I
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2015 Aug; 44(4):359-81. PubMed ID: 24563326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of phonetic dimensions on aphasic speech perception.
    Hessler D; Jonkers R; Bastiaanse R
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2010 Dec; 24(12):980-96. PubMed ID: 20887215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech perception of children with cochlear implants and children with traditional hearing aids.
    Mildner V; Sindija B; Zrinski KV
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):219-29. PubMed ID: 16428240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic-phonetic and auditory mechanisms of adaptation in the perception of sibilant fricatives.
    Chodroff E; Wilson C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):2027-2048. PubMed ID: 31875314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory steady state cortical responses indicate deviant phonemic-rate processing in adults with dyslexia.
    Poelmans H; Luts H; Vandermosten M; Boets B; Ghesquière P; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):134-43. PubMed ID: 21844810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
    Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impaired speech perception in poor readers: evidence from hearing and speech reading.
    de Gelder B; Vroomen J
    Brain Lang; 1998 Oct; 64(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 9743542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory development of the hearing child.
    Boothroyd A
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1997; 46():9-16. PubMed ID: 9309833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory processing, speech perception and phonological ability in pre-school children at high-risk for dyslexia: a longitudinal study of the auditory temporal processing theory.
    Boets B; Wouters J; van Wieringen A; Ghesquière P
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(8):1608-20. PubMed ID: 17303197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of second-formant transitions on the perception of Hebrew voiced stop consonants.
    Kishon-Rabin L; Dayan M; Michaeli O
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2003; 14(2):151-64. PubMed ID: 14558729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relation between phonetics and phonology.
    Blumstein SE
    Phonetica; 1991; 48(2-4):108-19. PubMed ID: 1800994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.