232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8820119)
1. Six-year clinical and histologic study of sinus-lift grafts.
Wheeler SL; Holmes RE; Calhoun CJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 8820119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture.
Hallman M; Sennerby L; Lundgren S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 12381063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus: a comparative histomorphometric study in sheep.
Haas R; Baron M; Donath K; Zechner W; Watzek G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 12074448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sinus grafting with a natural fluorohydroxyapatite for immediate load: a study with histologic analysis and histomorphometry.
Lee CY; Rohrer MD; Prasad HS; Stover JD; Suzuki JB
J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(4):164-75. PubMed ID: 19813420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Histological and clinical evaluation of 3 different grafting materials for sinus lifting procedure based on 8 cases.
Karabuda C; Ozdemir O; Tosun T; Anil A; Olgaç V
J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1436-42. PubMed ID: 11699487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maxillary sinus floor elevation using a combination of DFDBA and bovine-derived porous hydroxyapatite: a preliminary histologic and histomorphometric report.
Landi L; Pretel RW; Hakimi NM; Setayesh R
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2000 Dec; 20(6):574-83. PubMed ID: 11203594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of dental implants after staged sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients.
Bornstein MM; Chappuis V; von Arx T; Buser D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1034-43. PubMed ID: 18828820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical and histologic comparison of two different composite grafts for sinus augmentation: a pilot clinical trial.
Galindo-Moreno P; Avila G; Fernández-Barbero JE; Mesa F; O'Valle-Ravassa F; Wang HL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):755-9. PubMed ID: 18573123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Calvarial versus iliac crest for autologous bone graft material for a sinus lift procedure: a histomorphometric study.
Crespi R; Vinci R; Capparè P; Gherlone E; Romanos GE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):527-32. PubMed ID: 17929512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ridge augmentation and maxillary sinus grafting with a biphasic calcium phosphate: histologic and histomorphometric observations.
Friedmann A; Dard M; Kleber BM; Bernimoulin JP; Bosshardt DD
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):708-14. PubMed ID: 19453566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new porous hydroxyapatite for promotion of bone regeneration in maxillary sinus augmentation: clinical and histologic study in humans.
Mangano C; Bartolucci EG; Mazzocco C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 12608665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite mixed with fibrin glue and later placement of nonsubmerged implants: a retrospective study in 50 patients.
Hallman M; Nordin T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 15101593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Porous titanium granules used as osteoconductive material for sinus floor augmentation: a clinical pilot study.
Bystedt H; Rasmusson L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 11(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 18657154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The correlation of bone mineral density and histologic data in the early grafted maxillary sinus: a preliminary report.
Lee CY; Prasad HS; Suzuki JB; Stover JD; Rohrer MD
Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):202-14. PubMed ID: 21613947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term evaluation of implant survival in augmented sinuses: a case series.
Yamamichi N; Itose T; Neiva R; Wang HL
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Apr; 28(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 18546812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maxillary sinus augmentation with a porous synthetic hydroxyapatite and bovine-derived hydroxyapatite: a comparative clinical and histologic study.
Mangano C; Scarano A; Perrotti V; Iezzi G; Piattelli A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):980-6. PubMed ID: 18271380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endosseous implants and bone augmentation in the partially dentate maxilla: an analysis of 17 patients with a follow-up of 29 to 101 months.
Becktor JP; Isaksson S; Sennerby L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):603-8. PubMed ID: 17929521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sinus augmentation bone grafts for the provision of dental implants: report of clinical outcome.
McCarthy C; Patel RR; Wragg PF; Brook IM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):377-82. PubMed ID: 12814312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maxillary sinus augmentation with the xenograft Bio-Oss and autogenous intraoral bone for qualitative improvement of the implant site: a histologic and histomorphometric clinical study in humans.
Yildirim M; Spiekermann H; Handt S; Edelhoff D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 11280359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term assessment (5 to 71 months) of endosseous dental implants placed in the augmented maxillary sinus.
Olson JW; Dent CD; Morris HF; Ochi S
Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 11885175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
