These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8820121)
1. Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminum oxide. Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T; Andersson B Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 8820121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone. Wennerberg A; Ektessabi A; Albrektsson T; Johansson C; Andersson B Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 9274077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration. Kim YH; Koak JY; Chang IT; Wennerberg A; Heo SJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 12814309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia. Cordioli G; Majzoub Z; Piattelli A; Scarano A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11055134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of the bone response to machined and sandblasted titanium implants: an experimental study in rabbits. Piattelli A; Manzon L; Scarano A; Paolantonio M; Piattelli M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):805-10. PubMed ID: 9857591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone. Sul YT; Kang BS; Johansson C; Um HS; Park CJ; Albrektsson T J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Jun; 89(4):942-50. PubMed ID: 18470920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Increased bone contact to a calcium-incorporated oxidized commercially pure titanium implant: an in-vivo study in rabbits. Fröjd V; Franke-Stenport V; Meirelles L; Wennerberg A Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 37(6):561-6. PubMed ID: 18346880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved retention and bone-tolmplant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants. Ellingsen JE; Johansson CB; Wennerberg A; Holmén A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):659-66. PubMed ID: 15508981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of surface roughness on the displacement of osteogenic bone particles during placement of titanium screw-type implants. Tabassum A; Walboomers F; Wolke JG; Meijer GJ; Jansen JA Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 19673924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of a novel calcium titanate coating on the osseointegration of blasted endosseous implants in rabbit tibiae. Suh JY; Jeung OC; Choi BJ; Park JW Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Jun; 18(3):362-9. PubMed ID: 17298490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Oxidized titanium screws coated with calcium ions and their performance in rabbit bone. Sul YT; Johansson CB; Albrektsson T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):625-34. PubMed ID: 12381062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biological responses of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages. Choi JW; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Lim YJ; Kim SH; Lee JB J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):889-97. PubMed ID: 17168931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure. Sul YT; Johansson C; Wennerberg A; Cho LR; Chang BS; Albrektsson T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 15973946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of ion beam-assisted deposition of hydroxyapatite on the grit-blasted surface of endosseous implants in rabbit tibiae. Park YS; Yi KY; Lee IS; Han CH; Jung YC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 15747671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histometric evaluation of bone around titanium implants with different surface treatments in rats exposed to cigarette smoke inhalation. Correa MG; Gomes Campos ML; César-Neto JB; Casati MZ; Nociti FH; Sallum EA Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):588-93. PubMed ID: 19302391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of bioactive titanium implants following sodium removal treatment. Fawzy AS; Amer MA Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 18585776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of nicotine administration on different implant surfaces: a histometric study in rabbits. Stefani CM; Nogueira F; Sallum EA; de TS; Sallum AW; Nociti FH J Periodontol; 2002 Feb; 73(2):206-12. PubMed ID: 11895287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits. Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Osseointegration of commercial microstructured titanium implants incorporating magnesium: a histomorphometric study in rabbit cancellous bone. Park JW; An CH; Jeong SH; Suh JY Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Mar; 23(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 21435010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A removal torque and histomorphometric study of bone tissue reactions to commercially pure titanium and Vitallium implants. Johansson CB; Sennerby L; Albrektsson T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 1820312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]