These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8820704)

  • 1. Comparison of voice analysis systems for perturbation measurement.
    Bielamowicz S; Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Dauer MS; Berke GS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Feb; 39(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 8820704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Suitability of acoustic perturbation measures in analysing periodic and nearly periodic voice signals.
    Ma EP; Yiu EM
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2005; 57(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 15655340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Comparison of Healthy and Disordered Voices Using Multi-Dimensional Voice Program, Praat, and TF32.
    Keung LC; Richardson K; Sharp Matheron D; Martel-Sauvageau V
    J Voice; 2024 Jul; 38(4):963.e23-963.e38. PubMed ID: 35246346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
    Jannetts S; Lowit A
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic analysis of aperiodic voice: perturbation and nonlinear dynamic properties in esophageal phonation.
    Maccallum JK; Cai L; Zhou L; Zhang Y; Jiang JJ
    J Voice; 2009 May; 23(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 18411036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Objective acoustic analysis of pathological voices from patients with vocal nodules and polyps.
    Jiang JJ; Zhang Y; MacCallum J; Sprecher A; Zhou L
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(6):342-9. PubMed ID: 19864916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing reliability of perceptual ratings of roughness and acoustic measure of jitter.
    Rabinov CR; Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Bielamowicz S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Feb; 38(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 7731216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity of jitter measures in non-quasi-periodic voices. Part II: the effect of noise.
    Manfredi C; Giordano A; Schoentgen J; Fraj S; Bocchi L; Dejonckere P
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 21609247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pathologic voice type and the acoustic prediction of severity.
    Martin D; Fitch J; Wolfe V
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Aug; 38(4):765-71. PubMed ID: 7474970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diplophonia Disturbs Jitter and Shimmer Measurement.
    Aichinger P; Hagmüller M; Roesner I; Bigenzahn W; Schneider-Stickler B; Schoentgen J
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2016; 68(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 27439009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acoustic Voice Analysis of Young Turkish Speakers.
    Demirhan E; Unsal EM; Yilmaz C; Ertan E
    J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):378.e21-5. PubMed ID: 26223964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Required number of tokens to determine representative voice perturbation values.
    Scherer RC; Vail VJ; Guo CG
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 38(6):1260-9. PubMed ID: 8747819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The vocal clarity of female speech-language pathology students: an exploratory study.
    Warhurst S; Madill C; McCabe P; Heard R; Yiu E
    J Voice; 2012 Jan; 26(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 21439779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic analyses of sustained and running voices from patients with laryngeal pathologies.
    Zhang Y; Jiang JJ
    J Voice; 2008 Jan; 22(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 16978835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustic correlates of vocal quality.
    Eskenazi L; Childers DG; Hicks DM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):298-306. PubMed ID: 2359270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between subjective voice complaints and acoustic parameters in female teachers' voices.
    Rantala L; Vilkman E
    J Voice; 1999 Dec; 13(4):484-95. PubMed ID: 10622515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combined Use of Standard and Throat Microphones for Measurement of Acoustic Voice Parameters and Voice Categorization.
    Uloza V; Padervinskis E; Uloziene I; Saferis V; Verikas A
    J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 25795349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vocal stability in functional dysphonic versus healthy voices at different times of voice loading.
    Jilek C; Marienhagen J; Hacki T
    J Voice; 2004 Dec; 18(4):443-53. PubMed ID: 15567046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A computer system for acoustic analysis of pathological voices and laryngeal diseases screening.
    Hadjitodorov S; Mitev P
    Med Eng Phys; 2002 Jul; 24(6):419-29. PubMed ID: 12135650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laryngeal perturbation analysis: minimum length of analysis window.
    Karnell MP
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Jun; 34(3):544-8. PubMed ID: 2072678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.