These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8820805)

  • 1. Comparative study of two precision overdenture attachment designs.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo M; Condos S; Deutsch AS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Aug; 76(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 8820805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.
    Al-Ghafli SA; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Kang K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 19703620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the retentive properties of six prefabricated post overdenture attachment systems.
    Epstein DD; Epstein PL; Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Nov; 82(5):579-84. PubMed ID: 10559730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
    Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs.
    Williams BH; Ochiai KT; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):603-7. PubMed ID: 11753311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of in vitro cyclic dislodging on retentive force and removal torque of three overdenture attachment systems.
    Kobayashi M; Srinivasan M; Ammann P; Perriard J; Ohkubo C; Müller F; Belser UC; Schimmel M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 23566266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retention of implant-supported overdenture with bar/clip and stud attachment designs.
    Savabi O; Nejatidanesh F; Yordshahian F
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 21905896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of overdenture retention designs and implant orientations on load transfer characteristics.
    Federick DR; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Dec; 76(6):624-32. PubMed ID: 8957789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of the integral implant for overdenture stabilization.
    Block MS; Kent JN; Finger IM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 2133339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Occlusal force transmission by overdenture attachments.
    Thayer HH; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Mar; 41(3):266-71. PubMed ID: 368317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized clinical trial comparing two mandibular implant overdenture designs: 3-year prosthetic outcomes using a six-field protocol.
    Walton JN
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 12854788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Locator retention: does variation in number and configuration matter?
    Cayouette MJ; Barnes L; McPherson K; Wright GJ
    Gen Dent; 2017; 65(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 28068264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of implant angulation upon retention of overdenture attachments.
    Gulizio MP; Agar JR; Kelly JR; Taylor TD
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Mar; 14(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 15733129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retentive Properties of Two Stud Attachments with Polyetherketoneketone or Nylon Insert in Mandibular Implant Overdentures.
    Choi JW; Yun BH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1079-1088. PubMed ID: 30231095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The root-supported overdenture using the Locator overdenture attachment.
    Pavlatos J
    Gen Dent; 2002; 50(5):448-53; quiz 454-5. PubMed ID: 12448898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of implant angulation and cyclic dislodging on the retentive force of two different overdenture attachments - an in vitro study.
    Srinivasan M; Schimmel M; Badoud I; Ammann P; Herrmann FR; Müller F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 May; 27(5):604-11. PubMed ID: 26085188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attachment systems for implant overdenture: influence of implant inclination on retentive and lateral forces.
    Yang TC; Maeda Y; Gonda T; Kotecha S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1315-9. PubMed ID: 21426402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of load distribution for implant overdenture attachments.
    Porter JA; Petropoulos VC; Brunski JB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):651-62. PubMed ID: 12381065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.