These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8820897)

  • 1. The use of ratings of perceived exertion for regulating exercise levels in rowing ergometry.
    Marriott HE; Lamb KL
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1996; 72(3):267-71. PubMed ID: 8820897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regulating exercise intensity using ratings of perceived exertion during arm and leg ergometry.
    Kang J; Chaloupka EC; Mastrangelo MA; Donnelly MS; Martz WP; Robertson RJ
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1998 Aug; 78(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 9721003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ratings of perceived exertion in braille: validity and reliability in production mode.
    Buckley JP; Eston RG; Sim J
    Br J Sports Med; 2000 Aug; 34(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 10953905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The validity of ratings of perceived exertion for cross-modal regulation of swimming intensity.
    Green JM; Michael T; Solomon AH
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 1999 Sep; 39(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 10573662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanomyography, electromyography, heart rate, and ratings of perceived exertion during incremental cycle ergometry.
    Perry SR; Housh TJ; Johnson GO; Ebersole KT; Bull AJ; Evetovich TK; Smith DB
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2001 Jun; 41(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 11447360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regulating intensity using perceived exertion during extended exercise periods.
    Kang J; Hoffman JR; Walker H; Chaloupka EC; Utter AC
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2003 Jun; 89(5):475-82. PubMed ID: 12712344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sex- and age-related differences in the rating of perceived exertion after high-intensity rowing exercise during childhood and adolescence.
    Bardin J; Maciejewski H; Diry A; Droit-Volet S; Thomas C; Ratel S
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Aug; 60(8):e14296. PubMed ID: 36939076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Regulating intensity using perceived exertion: effect of exercise duration.
    Kang J; Chaloupka EC; Biren GB; Mastrangelo MA; Hoffman JR
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2009 Feb; 105(3):445-51. PubMed ID: 19002704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strong relationship between heart rate deflection point and ventilatory threshold in trained rowers.
    Mikulic P; Vucetic V; Sentija D
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Feb; 25(2):360-6. PubMed ID: 20040892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physiological and biomechanical responses to exercise on two different types of rowing ergometers in NCAA Division I oarswomen.
    Lu T; Jones MT; Yom J; Ishida A; White JB
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2023 Jul; 123(7):1529-1541. PubMed ID: 36929015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cardio-respiratory responses to rowing ergometry and treadmill exercise soon after myocardial infarction.
    Buckley JP; Davis JA; Simpson T
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1999 Dec; 31(12):1721-6. PubMed ID: 10613421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cardiorespiratory and perceptual responses to self-regulated and imposed submaximal arm-leg ergometry.
    Hill M; Talbot C; Puddiford M; Price M
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2018 May; 118(5):1011-1019. PubMed ID: 29511919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intermodal comparison of energy expenditure at exercise intensities corresponding to the perceptual preference range.
    Moyna NM; Robertson RJ; Meckes CL; Peoples JA; Millich NB; Thompson PD
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2001 Aug; 33(8):1404-10. PubMed ID: 11474346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Self-paced exercise is less physically challenging than enforced constant pace exercise of the same intensity: influence of complex central metabolic control.
    Lander PJ; Butterly RJ; Edwards AM
    Br J Sports Med; 2009 Oct; 43(10):789-95. PubMed ID: 19196729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of the adult OMNI scale of perceived exertion for cycle ergometer exercise.
    Robertson RJ; Goss FL; Dube J; Rutkowski J; Dupain M; Brennan C; Andreacci J
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2004 Jan; 36(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 14707775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The reproducibility of perceptually regulated exercise responses during short-term cycle ergometry.
    Hartshorn JE; Lamb KL
    Int J Sports Med; 2004 Jul; 25(5):362-7. PubMed ID: 15241716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ratings of Perceived Exertion and Physiological Responses in Children During Exercise.
    Erichsen JM; Dykstra BJ; Hidde MC; Mahon AD
    Int J Sports Med; 2017 Nov; 38(12):897-901. PubMed ID: 28934805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of energy expenditure during rowing and cycling ergometry.
    Hagerman FC; Lawrence RA; Mansfield MC
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1988 Oct; 20(5):479-88. PubMed ID: 3193864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The validity of regulating exercise intensity by ratings of perceived exertion.
    Dunbar CC; Robertson RJ; Baun R; Blandin MF; Metz K; Burdett R; Goss FL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1992 Jan; 24(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 1549002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of cadence and power output upon physiological and biomechanical responses to incremental arm-crank ergometry.
    Price MJ; Collins L; Smith PM; Goss-Sampson M
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2007 Aug; 32(4):686-92. PubMed ID: 17622283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.