BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8822163)

  • 1. Beyond category sorting and pleasantness rating: inducing relational and item-specific processing.
    Hodge MH; Otani H
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Jan; 24(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 8822163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A reexamination of the role of imagery in learning and memory.
    Marschark M; Hunt RR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Jul; 15(4):710-20. PubMed ID: 2526858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Concreteness effects in free recall: the roles of imaginal and relational processing.
    Marschark M; Surian L
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):612-20. PubMed ID: 1435264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual interference at encoding enhances item-specific encoding and disrupts relational encoding: evidence from multiple recall tests.
    Mulligan NW
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):539-46. PubMed ID: 10946537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Making judgments of learning enhances memory by inducing item-specific processing.
    Senkova O; Otani H
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jul; 49(5):955-967. PubMed ID: 33398785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relational and item-specific information: trade-off and redundancy.
    Engelkamp J; Biegelmann U; McDaniel MA
    Memory; 1998 May; 6(3):307-33. PubMed ID: 9709445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How does creating a concept map affect item-specific encoding?
    Grimaldi PJ; Poston L; Karpicke JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):1049-61. PubMed ID: 25528090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Item-specific and relational processing both improve recall accuracy in the DRM paradigm.
    Huff MJ; Bodner GE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1493-1506. PubMed ID: 30188245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The mnemonic advantage of processing fitness-relevant information.
    Kang SH; McDermott KB; Cohen SM
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Sep; 36(6):1151-6. PubMed ID: 18927033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The emergence of item-specific encoding effects in between-subjects designs: perceptual interference and multiple recall tests.
    Mulligan NW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):375-82. PubMed ID: 12120803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Memory in pregnancy and post-partum: Item specific and relational encoding processes in recall and recognition.
    Spataro P; Saraulli D; Oriolo D; Costanzi M; Zanetti H; Cestari V; Rossi-Arnaud C
    Scand J Psychol; 2016 Aug; 57(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 27197632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prerequisites for lack of age differences in memory performance.
    Bäckman L; Nilsson LG
    Exp Aging Res; 1985; 11(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 4092720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Categorical-relational and order-relational information in memory for subject-performed and experimenter-performed actions.
    Golly-Haring C; Engelkamp J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):965-75. PubMed ID: 14516228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall.
    Gathercole SE; Pickering SJ; Hall M; Peaker SM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 11216312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of category length and strength on familiarity in recognition.
    Shiffrin RM; Huber DE; Marinelli K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Mar; 21(2):267-87. PubMed ID: 7738500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on organization and order: investigating the roles of item-specific and relational information.
    Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Jan; 25(1):54-69. PubMed ID: 9949708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disruption of relational processing underlies poor memory for order.
    Jonker TR; MacLeod CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):831-40. PubMed ID: 25329084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Grouping in primary memory: the case of the compound suffix.
    LeCompte DC; Watkins MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Jan; 21(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 7876775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enactment enhances integration between verb and noun, but not relational processing, in episodic memory.
    von Essen JD
    Scand J Psychol; 2005 Aug; 46(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 16014075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age-related differences in memory as a function of imagery processing.
    Dirkx E; Craik FIM
    Psychol Aging; 1992 Sep; 7(3):352-358. PubMed ID: 1388855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.