These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8822163)

  • 1. Beyond category sorting and pleasantness rating: inducing relational and item-specific processing.
    Hodge MH; Otani H
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Jan; 24(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 8822163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A reexamination of the role of imagery in learning and memory.
    Marschark M; Hunt RR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Jul; 15(4):710-20. PubMed ID: 2526858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Concreteness effects in free recall: the roles of imaginal and relational processing.
    Marschark M; Surian L
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):612-20. PubMed ID: 1435264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual interference at encoding enhances item-specific encoding and disrupts relational encoding: evidence from multiple recall tests.
    Mulligan NW
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):539-46. PubMed ID: 10946537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Making judgments of learning enhances memory by inducing item-specific processing.
    Senkova O; Otani H
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jul; 49(5):955-967. PubMed ID: 33398785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relational and item-specific information: trade-off and redundancy.
    Engelkamp J; Biegelmann U; McDaniel MA
    Memory; 1998 May; 6(3):307-33. PubMed ID: 9709445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How does creating a concept map affect item-specific encoding?
    Grimaldi PJ; Poston L; Karpicke JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):1049-61. PubMed ID: 25528090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Item-specific and relational processing both improve recall accuracy in the DRM paradigm.
    Huff MJ; Bodner GE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1493-1506. PubMed ID: 30188245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The mnemonic advantage of processing fitness-relevant information.
    Kang SH; McDermott KB; Cohen SM
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Sep; 36(6):1151-6. PubMed ID: 18927033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The emergence of item-specific encoding effects in between-subjects designs: perceptual interference and multiple recall tests.
    Mulligan NW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):375-82. PubMed ID: 12120803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Memory in pregnancy and post-partum: Item specific and relational encoding processes in recall and recognition.
    Spataro P; Saraulli D; Oriolo D; Costanzi M; Zanetti H; Cestari V; Rossi-Arnaud C
    Scand J Psychol; 2016 Aug; 57(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 27197632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prerequisites for lack of age differences in memory performance.
    Bäckman L; Nilsson LG
    Exp Aging Res; 1985; 11(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 4092720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Categorical-relational and order-relational information in memory for subject-performed and experimenter-performed actions.
    Golly-Haring C; Engelkamp J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):965-75. PubMed ID: 14516228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall.
    Gathercole SE; Pickering SJ; Hall M; Peaker SM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 11216312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of category length and strength on familiarity in recognition.
    Shiffrin RM; Huber DE; Marinelli K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Mar; 21(2):267-87. PubMed ID: 7738500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on organization and order: investigating the roles of item-specific and relational information.
    Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Jan; 25(1):54-69. PubMed ID: 9949708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disruption of relational processing underlies poor memory for order.
    Jonker TR; MacLeod CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):831-40. PubMed ID: 25329084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Grouping in primary memory: the case of the compound suffix.
    LeCompte DC; Watkins MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Jan; 21(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 7876775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enactment enhances integration between verb and noun, but not relational processing, in episodic memory.
    von Essen JD
    Scand J Psychol; 2005 Aug; 46(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 16014075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age-related differences in memory as a function of imagery processing.
    Dirkx E; Craik FIM
    Psychol Aging; 1992 Sep; 7(3):352-358. PubMed ID: 1388855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.