These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8822352)

  • 1. A multicenter comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers: in vivo and in vitro measurements of bone mineral content and density.
    Economos CD; Nelson ME; Fiatarone MA; Dallal GE; Heymsfield SB; Wang J; Russell-Aulet M; Yasumura S; Ma R; Vaswani AN; Pierson RN
    J Bone Miner Res; 1996 Feb; 11(2):275-85. PubMed ID: 8822352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of phantoms for cross-calibration of lumbar spine DXA.
    Pearson D; Cawte SA; Green DJ
    Osteoporos Int; 2002 Dec; 13(12):948-54. PubMed ID: 12459937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A DXA Whole Body Composition Cross-Calibration Experience: Evaluation With Humans, Spine, and Whole Body Phantoms.
    Krueger D; Libber J; Sanfilippo J; Yu HJ; Horvath B; Miller CG; Binkley N
    J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 26071169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anomalies in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of total-body bone mineral during weight change using Lunar, Hologic and Norland instruments.
    Tothill P; Laskey MA; Orphanidou CI; van Wijk M
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Jul; 72(859):661-9. PubMed ID: 10624323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Technical considerations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based bone mineral measurements for pediatric studies.
    Koo WW; Walters J; Bush AJ
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Dec; 10(12):1998-2004. PubMed ID: 8619381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-calibration of GE/Lunar pencil and fan-beam dual energy densitometers--bone mineral density and body composition studies.
    Oldroyd B; Smith AH; Truscott JG
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2003 Aug; 57(8):977-87. PubMed ID: 12879093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Positive and negative effect of exogenous fat on the bone mineral density in healthy women by dual energy X-ray absorptiometer].
    Wu Y; Deng X; Jiang S
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Apr; 35(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 20448360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: comparison with single photon absorptiometry of the forearm and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine or femur.
    Mole PA; McMurdo ME; Paterson CR
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 71(844):427-32. PubMed ID: 9659136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of narrow-angle fan-beam and pencil-beam densitometers: in vivo and phantom study of the effect of bone density, scan mode, and tissue depth on spine measurements.
    Laskey MA; Murgatroyd PR; Prentice A
    J Clin Densitom; 2004; 7(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 15319507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Precision and accuracy of a transportable dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry unit for bone mineral measurements in guinea pigs.
    Fink C; Cooper HJ; Huebner JL; Guilak F; Kraus VB
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2002 Mar; 70(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 11907713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Regional variations in bone mineral density as assessed with dual-energy photon absorptiometry and dual x-ray absorptiometry.
    Feyerabend AJ; Lear JL
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):467-9. PubMed ID: 8421752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reproducibility of fan-beam DXA measurements in adults and phantoms.
    Ellis KJ; Shypailo RS; Steinberg FM; Lewis RD; Young RL; Wong WW
    J Clin Densitom; 2004; 7(4):413-8. PubMed ID: 15618602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Quality control of bone densitometry: precision, reproducibility, and clinical application].
    Gajardo H; Barrera G
    Rev Med Chil; 1998 Jan; 126(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 9629755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparisons between three dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring spine and femur.
    Tothill P; Fenner JA; Reid DM
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Jun; 68(810):621-9. PubMed ID: 7627485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intersite comparison of the Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray bone densitometer.
    Blake GM; Tong CM; Fogelman I
    Br J Radiol; 1991 May; 64(761):440-6. PubMed ID: 2036569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cross-calibration of a fan-beam X-ray densitometer with a pencil-beam system.
    Bouyoucef SE; Cullum ID; Ell PJ
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jun; 69(822):522-31. PubMed ID: 8757654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of weight change on total body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: results from a clinical trial.
    Blake GM; Herd RJ; Patel R; Fogelman I
    Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(10):832-9. PubMed ID: 11199186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of spine bone mineral density in ovariectomized rats using DXA.
    Yamauchi H; Kushida K; Yamazaki K; Inoue T
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1033-9. PubMed ID: 7484278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro comparability of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) bone densitometers.
    Rencken ML; Murano R; Drinkwater BL; Chesnut CH
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1991 Apr; 48(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 2059876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparisons between a pencil beam and two fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue.
    Tothill P; Hannan WJ; Wilkinson S
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 74(878):166-76. PubMed ID: 11718390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.