These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Guilt by association. van Rijswijk L Ostomy Wound Manage; 1998 Apr; 44(4):4, 6. PubMed ID: 9611600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Upgrading our instructions for authors. Schriger DL; Wears RL; Cooper RJ; Callaham ML Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):565-7. PubMed ID: 12658258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Preliminary but promising: the value of limited studies. Keeling RP J Am Coll Health; 1999 Nov; 48(3):99-102. PubMed ID: 10584443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A model for learning research by doing research. Curry J; Alminde C; Bloom K; Cramsie K J Nurs Adm; 2008 May; 38(5):215-8. PubMed ID: 18469613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Pre-peer review, peer review, and post-peer review: three areas with potential for improvement. Stang A; Poole C; Schmidt-Pokrzywniak A J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):309-10. PubMed ID: 18313552 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the reviewers of animal research. Rollin BE; Loew FM Science; 2001 Nov; 294(5548):1831-2. PubMed ID: 11732546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. US research safety system 'in jeopardy'. Wadman M Nature; 1998 Jun; 393(6686):610. PubMed ID: 9641660 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. What we want. Part 4: Case reports and committee reports. Leduc CP Can Fam Physician; 1996 Apr; 42():592-3, 604-6. PubMed ID: 8653021 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Fumes from the spleen. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 1996 Oct; 10(4):406-9. PubMed ID: 8931054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time. Clarke SP Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Dec; 38(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 17342873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability. Marsh HW; Jayasinghe UW; Bond NW Am Psychol; 2008 Apr; 63(3):160-8. PubMed ID: 18377106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robust research: Institutions must do their part for reproducibility. Begley CG; Buchan AM; Dirnagl U Nature; 2015 Sep; 525(7567):25-7. PubMed ID: 26333454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethical issues in the substantive and procedural aspects of research ethics review. Meslin EM Health Law Can; 1993; 13(3):179-91. PubMed ID: 10125789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. European Commission funding of research. Martin J Lancet; 1999 Apr; 353(9159):1192. PubMed ID: 10210019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. 'Bibliometrics' is flawed. Williamson T Nurs Times; 2008 Apr 8-14; 104(14):12. PubMed ID: 18497232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of published articles in CAJM. Nystrom L Cent Afr J Med; 1998 Oct; 44(10):264-5. PubMed ID: 10101438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]