These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8823088)

  • 41. In vivo assessment of an absorbable and nonabsorbable knotless barbed suture for laparoscopic single-layer enterotomy closure: a clinical and biomechanical comparison against nonbarbed suture.
    Omotosho P; Yurcisin B; Ceppa E; Miller J; Kirsch D; Portenier DD
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2011 Dec; 21(10):893-7. PubMed ID: 22129144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [An experimental study of reconstruction--differences of the healing process by materials].
    Inoue M; Shibata K; Nakashima S; Sugimoto H; Koga Y
    Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Jan; 38(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 2329304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Tissue reaction in microvessel anastomoses. Comparative study of resorbable and nonresorbable suture material].
    Kaletsch B; Rehm KE; Stambolis C
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 1982; 14(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 6763589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A new absorbable synthetic suture in growing and adult primary vascular anastomoses: morphologic study.
    Dardik H; Dardik I; Katz AR; Smith RB; Schwibner BH; Laufman H
    Surgery; 1970 Dec; 68(6):1112-21. PubMed ID: 5483244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Incisional hernia after abdominal closure with slowly absorbable versus fast absorbable, antibacterial-coated sutures.
    Justinger C; Slotta JE; Schilling MK
    Surgery; 2012 Mar; 151(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 22088813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Blood vessel wall regeneration in the use of a new monofilament, resorbable suture material for arterial anastomoses].
    Schmitz-Rixen T; Horsch S; Klein B; Pichlmaier H
    Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1984; 362(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 6423918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Evaluation of nonabsorbable surgical sutures in tubal anastomoses with use of microsurgical techniques. An experimental study].
    Murawski M; Staniszewska-Kuś J; Rutowski R
    Polim Med; 2007; 37(2):57-66. PubMed ID: 17957949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The important role of graft organization at the vascular prosthetic anastomosis.
    Sasaki H
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 1980 Dec; 132(4):405-11. PubMed ID: 6266071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Absorbable versus nonabsorbable sutures to prevent postoperative stretching of wound area.
    Nordström RE; Nordström RM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1986 Aug; 78(2):186-90. PubMed ID: 3725965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Microvascular anastomosis with absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures--a comparative study in rats.
    Mii Y; Tamai S; Hori Y; Shimizu T; Fukui A
    J Microsurg; 1980 Sep; 2(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 16320522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Sutures in A1 Pulley Release.
    Kim YB; Choi YS; Yoon TH; Lee HD
    Hand (N Y); 2023 Nov; ():15589447231210332. PubMed ID: 37997760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The fate of non-absorbable suture in growing vascular anastomoses in liver transplantation.
    Soejima Y; Yanaga K; Nishizaki T; Yoshizumi T; Uchiyama H; Sugimachi K
    Hepatogastroenterology; 1997; 44(13):227-30. PubMed ID: 9058149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Use of an absorbable suture material in vascular anastomoses in pediatric liver transplantation.
    Contis JC; Heffron TG; Whitington PF; Emond JC
    Transplant Proc; 1993 Apr; 25(2):1878-80. PubMed ID: 8470212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Absorbable versus nonabsorbable suture for microneurorrhaphy.
    Cham RB; Peimer CA; Howard CS; Walsh WP; Eckert BS
    J Hand Surg Am; 1984 May; 9(3):434-40. PubMed ID: 6373903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of absorbable with nonabsorbable sutures in closure of facial skin wounds.
    Parell GJ; Becker GD
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2003; 5(6):488-90. PubMed ID: 14623686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Polydioxanone and polypropylene suture material in free internal mammary artery graft anastomoses.
    Aarnio P; Harjula A; Lehtola A; Sariola H; Mattila S
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Nov; 96(5):741-5. PubMed ID: 3141723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Conjunctival Müllerectomy With or Without Tarsectomy Using Absorbable Versus Nonabsorbable Suture.
    Mechels KB; Hwang CJ; Perry JD
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 39(4):386-388. PubMed ID: 36804359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Histologic change of the meniscus and cartilage tissue after meniscal suture.
    Yasunaga T; Kimura M; Kikuchi S
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2001 Jun; (387):232-40. PubMed ID: 11400890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Synthetic absorable sutures.
    Laufman H; Rubel T
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1977 Oct; 145(4):597-608. PubMed ID: 331523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Common bile duct healing. Do different absorbable sutures affect stricture formation and tensile strength?
    Sharp KW; Ross CB; Tillman VN; Dunn JF
    Arch Surg; 1989 Apr; 124(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 2930349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.