111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8824140)
1. Can noninvasive studies replace conventional angiography in the preoperative evaluation of carotid stenosis?
De Marco JK; Schonfeld S; Wesbey G
Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 1996 Nov; 6(4):911-29. PubMed ID: 8824140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy of screening MR angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis.
White JE; Russell WL; Greer MS; Whittle MT
Am Surg; 1994 May; 60(5):340-8. PubMed ID: 8161084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MR angiography of the carotid bifurcation: artifacts and limitations.
Patel MR; Klufas RA; Kim D; Edelman RR; Kent KC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jun; 162(6):1431-7. PubMed ID: 8192013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Carotid endarterectomy: preoperative evaluation of candidates with combined Doppler sonography and MR angiography. Work in progress.
Polak JF; Kalina P; Donaldson MC; O'Leary DH; Whittemore AD; Mannick JA
Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):333-8. PubMed ID: 8421730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography.
De Marco JK; Nesbit GM; Wesbey GE; Richardson D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1205-12. PubMed ID: 7976902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Carotid artery stenosis: preoperative noninvasive evaluation in a community hospital.
Nicholas GG; Osborne MA; Jaffe JW; Reed JF
J Vasc Surg; 1995 Jul; 22(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 7602719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determination of 60% or greater carotid stenosis: a prospective comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound with conventional angiography.
Jackson MR; Chang AS; Robles HA; Gillespie DL; Olsen SB; Kaiser WJ; Goff JM; O'Donnell SD; Rich NM
Ann Vasc Surg; 1998 May; 12(3):236-43. PubMed ID: 9588509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical carotid MR angiography with multiple overlapping thin-slab acquisition: comparison with conventional angiography.
Blatter DD; Bahr AL; Parker DL; Robison RO; Kimball JA; Perry DM; Horn S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Dec; 161(6):1269-77. PubMed ID: 8249741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic resonance angiography and duplex imaging: noninvasive tests for selecting symptomatic carotid endarterectomy candidates.
Turnipseed WD; Kennell TW; Turski PA; Acher CW; Hoch JR
Surgery; 1993 Oct; 114(4):643-8; discussion 648-9. PubMed ID: 8211677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Multiple slab MR angiography of the A. carotis interna: a preoperative comparative study].
Vogl TJ; Heinzinger K; Juergens M; Kutter R; Hepp W; Balzer JO; Haupt G; Banzer D; Felix R
Rofo; 1995 May; 162(5):404-11. PubMed ID: 7772762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [MR-angiography and duplex-ultrasonography: predictive reliability for angiographically determined internal carotid artery stenosis >/= 70-99%].
Wölfle KD; Schnur C; Pfadenhauer K; Bruijnen H; Bohndorf K; Loeprecht H
Zentralbl Chir; 2002 Feb; 127(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 11894206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. For severe carotid stenosis found on ultrasound, further arterial evaluation prior to carotid endarterectomy is unnecessary: the argument against.
Rothwell PM
Stroke; 2003 Jul; 34(7):1817-9; discussion 1819. PubMed ID: 12829870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Carotid artery stenosis: clinical efficacy of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography.
Heiserman JE; Drayer BP; Fram EK; Keller PJ; Bird CR; Hodak JA; Flom RA
Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):761-8. PubMed ID: 1535891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Specificity of MR angiography as a confirmatory test of carotid artery stenosis.
Kallmes DF; Omary RA; Dix JE; Evans AJ; Hillman BJ
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1996 Sep; 17(8):1501-6. PubMed ID: 8883649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of atherosclerotic internal carotid stenosis as the noninvasive imaging modality in revascularization decision making.
Cosottini M; Pingitore A; Puglioli M; Michelassi MC; Lupi G; Abbruzzese A; Calabrese R; Lombardi M; Parenti G; Bartolozzi C
Stroke; 2003 Mar; 34(3):660-4. PubMed ID: 12624288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Study of atheromatous stenoses of carotid bifurcations by Doppler ultrasound, spiral angio-MRI, magnetic resonance angiography and comparison with arteriography].
Drevet D; Russier S; Agé B; Lépine PM; Zabot JM; Joffre P
J Radiol; 1997 Dec; 78(12):1271-7. PubMed ID: 9499967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Carotid stenosis. A neurologist's perspective.
Wilterdink JL; Feldmann E
Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 1996 Nov; 6(4):831-41. PubMed ID: 8824134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical significance of the flow gap in carotid magnetic resonance angiography.
Heiserman JE; Zabramski JM; Drayer BP; Keller PJ
J Neurosurg; 1996 Sep; 85(3):384-7. PubMed ID: 8751620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of extracranial carotid artery disease.
Serfaty JM; Chirossel P; Chevallier JM; Ecochard R; Froment JC; Douek PC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Aug; 175(2):455-63. PubMed ID: 10915694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Carotid occlusive disease: primary care of patients with or without symptoms.
Eugene JR; Abdallah M; Miglietta M; Vernenkar VV; Pascual R; Briones R; Barnes T; Hager J
Geriatrics; 1999 May; 54(5):24-6, 29-30, 33 passim. PubMed ID: 10365184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
