These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 882620)

  • 1. Classical skin conductance response conditioning: effects of random intermittent reinforcement.
    Williams WC; Prokasy WF
    Psychophysiology; 1977 Jul; 14(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 882620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Classical skin conductance response conditioning: effects of intermittent reinforcement and information about schedule contingencies.
    Williams WC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1975 Jul; 104(4):501-9. PubMed ID: 1194863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Specificity of skin potential reflex in conditioning process].
    Yamazaki K; Watanabe T; Niimi Y
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1969 Jun; 40(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 5818022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of UCS probability on the contingent negative variation and electrodermal response during long ISI conditioning.
    Backs RW; Grings WW
    Psychophysiology; 1985 May; 22(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 4011796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Response relationships in SRR conditioning.
    Martin I; Levy AB; Slubicka B
    Psychophysiology; 1975 Jan; 12(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 1114215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of interstimulus interval, forewarning, and instructions on extinction of the GSR.
    Wickens DD; Harding GB
    J Exp Psychol; 1967 Jul; 74(3):363-9. PubMed ID: 6052614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrodermal responses and subjective estimates of UCS probability in a long interstimulus interval conditioning paradigm.
    Ohman A; Ellström PE; Björkstrand PA
    Psychophysiology; 1976 Mar; 13(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 1257373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Autonomic conditioning in chronic schizophrenia.
    Ax AF; Bamford JL; Beckett PG; Fretz NF; Gottlieb JS
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1970 Aug; 76(1):140-54. PubMed ID: 5482008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trace reflex formation in senescence and senility.
    Solyom L; Crowell T
    Recent Adv Biol Psychiatry; 1968; 10():294-301. PubMed ID: 4872757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Schedule-induced electrodermal responding in children.
    Latzman RD; Knutson JF; Fowles DC
    Psychophysiology; 2006 Nov; 43(6):623-32. PubMed ID: 17076819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Classical conditioning of the galvanic skin response to verbal concepts.
    Brotsky SJ
    J Exp Psychol; 1968 Feb; 76(2):244-53. PubMed ID: 5636567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aversion therapy.
    McConaghy N
    Semin Psychiatry; 1972 May; 4(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 4680217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Palmar-Dorsal skin conductance differences during classical conditioning.
    Mordkoff AM
    Psychophysiology; 1968 Jul; 5(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 5663773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of cognitive control processes on the classically conditioned galvanic skin response: a within-subjects design.
    Harvey CB; Wickens DD
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Dec; 101(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 4753857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Skin conductance response conditioning with high CS intensities: additional evidence with new controls.
    Spurr CW; Prokasy WF; Williams WC; Clark CG
    Psychophysiology; 1977 Sep; 14(5):468-74. PubMed ID: 905484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Classical appetitive conditioning of the GSR with cool air as UCS, and the roles of UCS onset and offset as reinforcers of the CR.
    Furedy JJ
    J Exp Psychol; 1967 Sep; 75(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 6065840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Galvanic skin response: some methodological considerations on measurement, habituation, and classical conditioning.
    Hölzl R; Wilhelm H; Lutzenberger W; Schandry R
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1975; 127(1-2):1-22. PubMed ID: 1231679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CHARACTERISTICS OF A CONDITIONED RESPONSE IN HUMAN SUBJECTS DURING EXTINCTION TRIALS FOLLOWING A SINGLE TRAUMATIC CONDITIONING TRIAL.
    CAMPBELL D; SANDERSON RE; LAVERTY SG
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1964 Jun; 68():629-39. PubMed ID: 14170047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Operant conditioning of GSR amplitude.
    Helmer JE; Furedy JJ
    J Exp Psychol; 1968 Nov; 78(3):463-7. PubMed ID: 5705858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance in eyelid conditioning following changes in reinforcement schedule.
    RUNQUIST WN
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 Jun; 65():617-8. PubMed ID: 13975554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.