71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8826714)
1. Mean glandular dose and the standard breast.
Thiele DL; Craig AR
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1996 Jun; 19(2):94-6. PubMed ID: 8826714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. TLD measurements of in vivo mammographic exposures and the calculated mean glandular dose across the United States.
Gentry JR; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 1996 Jun; 23(6):899-903. PubMed ID: 8798175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating mean glandular dose using proprietary mammography phantoms.
Hartley LD; Cobb BJ; Hutchinson DE
Appl Radiat Isot; 1999 Jan; 50(1):205-13. PubMed ID: 10028638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Guideline for determining the mean glandular dose according to DIN 6868-162 and threshold contrast visibility according to the quality assurance guideline for digital mammography systems.
Sommer A; Schopphoven S; Land I; Blaser D; Sobczak T;
Rofo; 2014 May; 186(5):474-81. PubMed ID: 24557600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Guideline for the additional test positions according to the EPQC 4th Edition for Digital Mammography Systems].
Sommer A; Lenzen H; Blaser D; Ehlers SE; Schopphoven S; John C;
Rofo; 2009 Sep; 181(9):845-50. PubMed ID: 19676011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammography equipment performance, image quality and mean glandular dose in Malta.
Borg M; Badr I; Royle GJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Sep; 156(2):168-83. PubMed ID: 23525916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of exposure in mammography: limitations of average glandular dose and proposal of a new quantity.
Geeraert N; Klausz R; Muller S; Bloch I; Bosmans H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):342-5. PubMed ID: 25897143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mammography radiation dose: initial results from Serbia based on mean glandular dose assessment for phantoms and patients.
Ciraj-Bjelac O; Beciric S; Arandjic D; Kosutic D; Kovacevic M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jun; 140(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 20159918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Technical note: perspex blocks for estimation of dose to a standard breast--effect of variation in block thickness.
Faulkner K; Law J; Cranley K
Br J Radiol; 1995 Feb; 68(806):194-6. PubMed ID: 7735750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Review of the first 50 cases completed by the RACR mammography QA programme: phantom image quality, processor control and dose considerations.
McLean D; Eckert M; Heard R; Chan W
Australas Radiol; 1997 Nov; 41(4):387-91. PubMed ID: 9409037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Entrance skin exposure and mean glandular dose: effect of scatter and field gradient at mammography.
Ng KH; Aus RJ; DeWerd LA; Vetter JR
Radiology; 1997 Nov; 205(2):395-8. PubMed ID: 9356619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Mammography -a guidance level and the present situation of mammographic dose-].
Terada H
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(2):65-73. PubMed ID: 12766282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of mean glandular dose in mammography.
Faulkner K; Law J; Robson KJ
Br J Radiol; 1995 Aug; 68(812):877-81. PubMed ID: 7551786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of glandularity and breast radiation dose from mammography results in Japanese women.
Yamamuro M; Asai Y; Yamada K; Ozaki Y; Matsumoto M; Murakami T
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Jan; 57(1):289-298. PubMed ID: 30099671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammography of a phantom and breast tissue with synchrotron radiation and a linear-array silicon detector.
Arfelli F; Bonvicini V; Bravin A; Cantatore G; Castelli E; Dalla Palma L; Di Michiel M; Longo R; Olivo A; Pani S; Pontoni D; Poropat P; Prest M; Rashevsky A; Tromba G; Vacchi A
Radiology; 1998 Sep; 208(3):709-15. PubMed ID: 9722850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Method for determination of the mean fraction of glandular tissue in individual female breasts using mammography.
Jansen JT; Veldkamp WJ; Thijssen MA; van Woudenberg S; Zoetelief J
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(24):5953-67. PubMed ID: 16333166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative study of dose values and image quality in mammography in the area of Madrid.
Morán P; Chevalier M; Vanó E
Br J Radiol; 1994 Jun; 67(798):556-63. PubMed ID: 8032809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation.
Boone JM; Nelson TR; Lindfors KK; Seibert JA
Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):657-67. PubMed ID: 11719660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reference levels for image quality in mammography.
Zdesar U
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):170-2. PubMed ID: 18375465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of mean glandular dose diagnostic reference levels within the all-digital Irish National Breast Screening Programme and the Irish Symptomatic Breast Services.
O'Leary D; Rainford L
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Mar; 153(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 22740646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
