117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8826783)
1. Efficacy of hydrocolloid occlusive dressing technique in decubitus ulcer treatment: a comparative study.
Kim YC; Shin JC; Park CI; Oh SH; Choi SM; Kim YS
Yonsei Med J; 1996 Jun; 37(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 8826783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pressure ulcers--randomised controlled trial comparing hydrocolloid and saline gauze dressings.
Chang KW; Alsagoff S; Ong KT; Sim PH
Med J Malaysia; 1998 Dec; 53(4):428-31. PubMed ID: 10971989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hydrocolloid versus saline-gauze dressings in treating pressure ulcers: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Xakellis GC; Chrischilles EA
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 May; 73(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 1580775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pressure sore management: efficacy of a moisture reactive occlusive dressing.
Yarkony GM; Kramer E; King R; Lukanc C; Carle TV
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1984 Oct; 65(10):597-600. PubMed ID: 6487064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two methods of managing pressure ulcers.
Colwell JC; Foreman MD; Trotter JP
Decubitus; 1993 Jul; 6(4):28-36. PubMed ID: 8297488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective, randomized, multisite clinical evaluation of a transparent absorbent acrylic dressing and a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of Stage II and shallow Stage III pressure ulcers.
Brown-Etris M; Milne C; Orsted H; Gates JL; Netsch D; Punchello M; Couture N; Albert M; Attrell E; Freyberg J
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Apr; 21(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 18385577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized clinical study comparing a hydrocellular dressing to a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of pressure ulcers.
Seeley J; Jensen JL; Hutcherson J
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Jun; 45(6):39-44, 46-7. PubMed ID: 10655861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of a new occlusive hydrocolloid dressing.
Mulder GD; Albert SF; Grimwood RE
Cutis; 1985 Apr; 35(4):396-7, 400. PubMed ID: 3996043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [A comparison of the efficacy of different wound dressing management techniques in preventing pressure ulcers].
Tsao WY; Lo SF; Harmod T; Lee RP
Hu Li Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 60(4):65-75. PubMed ID: 23922092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Care of pressure sores: a controlled study of the use of a hydrocolloid dressing compared with wet saline gauze compresses.
Alm A; Hornmark AM; Fall PA; Linder L; Bergstrand B; Ehrnebo M; Madsen SM; Setterberg G
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1989; 149():1-10. PubMed ID: 2694713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Management of leg ulcers with hydrocolloid occlusive dressing.
Friedman SJ; Su WP
Arch Dermatol; 1984 Oct; 120(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 6486846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.
Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A cost and clinical effectiveness analysis among moist wound healing dressings versus traditional methods in home care patients with pressure ulcers.
Souliotis K; Kalemikerakis I; Saridi M; Papageorgiou M; Kalokerinou A
Wound Repair Regen; 2016 May; 24(3):596-601. PubMed ID: 27037729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using transparent polyurethane film and hydrocolloid dressings to prevent pressure ulcers.
Dutra RA; Salomé GM; Alves JR; Pereira VO; Miranda FD; Vallim VB; de Brito MJ; Ferreira LM
J Wound Care; 2015 Jun; 24(6):268, 270-1, 273-5. PubMed ID: 26075375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized clinical trial comparing hydrocolloid, phenytoin and simple dressings for the treatment of pressure ulcers [ISRCTN33429693].
Hollisaz MT; Khedmat H; Yari F
BMC Dermatol; 2004 Dec; 4(1):18. PubMed ID: 15601464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors influencing pressure ulcer healing in adults over 50: an exploratory study.
Jones KR; Fennie K
J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2007 Jul; 8(6):378-87. PubMed ID: 17619036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective, randomized clinical trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of a modern foam dressing versus a traditional saline gauze dressing in the treatment of stage II pressure ulcers.
Payne WG; Posnett J; Alvarez O; Brown-Etris M; Jameson G; Wolcott R; Dharma H; Hartwell S; Ochs D
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 Feb; 55(2):50-5. PubMed ID: 19246785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hydrocolloid dressing versus tulle gauze in the treatment of abrasions in cyclists.
Hermans MH
Int J Sports Med; 1991 Dec; 12(6):581-4. PubMed ID: 1797702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective evaluation of occlusive hydrocolloid dressing versus conventional gauze dressing regarding the healing effect after abdominal operations: randomized controlled trial.
Shinohara T; Yamashita Y; Satoh K; Mikami K; Yamauchi Y; Hoshino S; Noritomi A; Maekawa T
Asian J Surg; 2008 Jan; 31(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 18334461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of a hydrocolloid dressing on bacterial growth and the healing process of leg ulcers.
Annoni F; Rosina M; Chiurazzi D; Ceva M
Int Angiol; 1989; 8(4):224-8. PubMed ID: 2634718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
