299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8826955)
1. The timing and sequence of multiple device-related complications in patients with long-term indwelling Groshong catheters.
Tolar B; Gould JR
Cancer; 1996 Sep; 78(6):1308-13. PubMed ID: 8826955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Insertion and management of long-term central venous devices: role of radiologic imaging techniques].
Capaccioli L; Nistri M; Distante V; Rontini M; Manetti A; Stecco A
Radiol Med; 1998 Oct; 96(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9972217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The prognostic significance of the ball-valve effect in Groshong catheters.
Tolar B; Gould JR
Support Care Cancer; 1996 Jan; 4(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 8771292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Externalized Groshong catheters and Hickman ports for central venous access in gynecologic oncology patients.
Gleeson NC; Fiorica JV; Mark JE; Pinelli DM; Hoffman MS; Roberts WS; Cavanagh D
Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Dec; 51(3):372-6. PubMed ID: 8112648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparisons of outcomes and survivals for two central venous access port systems.
Hou SM; Wang PC; Sung YC; Lee HH; Liu HT; Chen YH
J Surg Oncol; 2005 Jul; 91(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 15999349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective randomized comparative evaluation of proximal valve polyurethane and distal valve silicone peripherally inserted central catheters.
Ong CK; Venkatesh SK; Lau GB; Wang SC
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Aug; 21(8):1191-6. PubMed ID: 20598573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Groshong versus Hickman catheters.
Pasquale MD; Campbell JM; Magnant CM
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1992 May; 174(5):408-10. PubMed ID: 1570619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The complications of central venous access systems: a study of 218 patients.
Torramadé JR; Cienfuegos JA; Hernández JL; Pardo F; Benito C; González J; Balén E; de Villa V
Eur J Surg; 1993; 159(6-7):323-7. PubMed ID: 8104491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Long term central venous catheterization revisited].
Palermo S; Campolucci A; Capozza F; Cammardella MP; Balestrero A; Ferrando F; Basta P; Launo C
Minerva Anestesiol; 1995 Nov; 61(11):451-6. PubMed ID: 8677035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term central venous catheters: size and location do matter.
Onders RP; Shenk RR; Stellato TA
Am J Surg; 2006 Mar; 191(3):396-9. PubMed ID: 16490554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk factors for early catheter-related infections in cancer patients.
Penel N; Neu JC; Clisant S; Hoppe H; Devos P; Yazdanpanah Y
Cancer; 2007 Oct; 110(7):1586-92. PubMed ID: 17685401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Complications and cost associated with parenteral nutrition delivered to hospitalized patients through either subclavian or peripherally-inserted central catheters.
Cowl CT; Weinstock JV; Al-Jurf A; Ephgrave K; Murray JA; Dillon K
Clin Nutr; 2000 Aug; 19(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 10952794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study between two central veins for the introduction of totally implantable venous access devices in 1201 cancer patients.
Araújo C; Silva JP; Antunes P; Fernandes JM; Dias C; Pereira H; Dias T; Fougo JL
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb; 34(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 17566692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized, prospective trial of standard Hickman compared with Groshong central venous catheters in pediatric oncology patients.
Warner BW; Haygood MM; Davies SL; Hennies GA
J Am Coll Surg; 1996 Aug; 183(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 8696545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Groshong catheter-related complications in children with cancer.
Ruggiero A; Barone G; Margani G; Nanni L; Pittiruti M; Riccardi R
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2010 Jul; 54(7):947-51. PubMed ID: 20162685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Thrombotic complications of silicone rubber catheters during autologous marrow and peripheral stem cell transplantation: prospective comparison of Hickman and Groshong catheters.
Haire WD; Lieberman RP; Lund GB; Edney JA; Kessinger A; Armitage JO
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1991 Jan; 7(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 1675136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. External jugular Groshong catheter is associated with fewer complications than a subclavian Argyle catheter.
Ishizuka M; Nagata H; Takagi K; Horie T; Furihata M; Nakagawa A; Kubota K
Eur Surg Res; 2008; 40(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 17998779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Insertion of Groshong central venous catheters utilizing fluoroscopic techniques.
Burnett AF; Lossef SV; Barth KH; Grendys EC; Johnson JC; Barter JF; Barnes WA
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Jan; 52(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 8307504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcome and survival of temporary hemodialysis catheters: a prospective study from a single center in Iraq.
Altaee KH; Theeb OA; Al-Timimi SM; Saeed HM; Alshamma I
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl; 2007 Sep; 18(3):370-7. PubMed ID: 17679748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Implantable catheter systems. Experiences with 1000 patients with central venous ports].
Kock HJ; Krause U; Pietsch M; Rasfeld S; Walz MK
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1996 Jan; 121(3):47-51. PubMed ID: 8565809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
