235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8827589)
1. Field evaluation of arthropod repellents, deet and a piperidine compound, AI3-37220, against Anopheles funestus and Anopheles arabiensis in western Kenya.
Walker TW; Robert LL; Copeland RA; Githeko AK; Wirtz RA; Githure JI; Klein TA
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1996 Jun; 12(2 Pt 1):172-6. PubMed ID: 8827589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laboratory evaluation of AI3-37220, AI3-35765, CIC-4, and deet repellents against three species of mosquitoes.
Debboun M; Strickman D; Klein TA; Glass JA; Wylie E; Laughinghouse A; Wirtz RA; Gupta RK
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1999 Sep; 15(3):342-7. PubMed ID: 10480126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Field evaluation of the repellents deet, CIC-4, and AI3-37220 against Anopheles in Lae, Papua New Guinea.
Frances SP; Cooper RD; Popat S; Sweeney AW
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1999 Sep; 15(3):339-41. PubMed ID: 10480125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Field evaluation of repellents containing deet and AI3-37220 against Anopheles koliensis in Papua New Guinea.
Frances SP; Cooper RD; Popat S; Beebe NW
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2001 Mar; 17(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 11345417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Response of wild Anopheles funestus to repellent-protected volunteers is unaffected by malaria infection of the vector.
Copeland RS; Walker TW; Robert LL; Githure JI; Wirtz RA; Klein TA
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1995 Dec; 11(4):438-40. PubMed ID: 8825504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laboratory and field evaluation of deet, CIC-4, and AI3-37220 against Anopheles dirus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand.
Frances SP; Klein TA; Hildebrandt DW; Burge R; Noigamol C; Eikarat N; Sripongsai B; Wirtz RA
J Med Entomol; 1996 Jul; 33(4):511-5. PubMed ID: 8699442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laboratory and field evaluation of the repellents deet, CIC-4, and AI3-37220 against Anopheles farauti (Diptera: Culicidae) in Australia.
Frances SP; Cooper RD; Sweeney AW
J Med Entomol; 1998 Sep; 35(5):690-3. PubMed ID: 9775594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laboratory and field evaluations of the insect repellent 3535 (ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate) and deet against mosquito vectors in Thailand.
Thavara U; Tawatsin A; Chompoosri J; Suwonkerd W; Chansang UR; Asavadachanukorn P
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2001 Sep; 17(3):190-5. PubMed ID: 14529087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of repellent formulations containing deet against mosquitoes in northeastern Thailand.
Frances SP; Eamsila C; Pilakasiri C; Linthicum KJ
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1996 Jun; 12(2 Pt 1):331-3. PubMed ID: 8827616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Field evaluation of deet and a piperidine repellent against Aedes communis (Diptera: Culicidae) and Simulium venustum (Diptera: Simuliidae) in the Adirondack Mountains of New York.
Debboun M; Strickman D; Solberg VB; Wilkerson RC; McPherson KR; Golenda C; Keep L; Wirtz RA; Burge R; Klein TA
J Med Entomol; 2000 Nov; 37(6):919-23. PubMed ID: 11126550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Field evaluation of the efficacy and persistence of insect repellents DEET, IR3535, and KBR 3023 against Anopheles gambiae complex and other Afrotropical vector mosquitoes.
Costantini C; Badolo A; Ilboudo-Sanogo E
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg; 2004 Nov; 98(11):644-52. PubMed ID: 15363644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a eucalyptus-based repellent against Anopheles spp. in Tanzania.
Trigg JK
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1996 Jun; 12(2 Pt 1):243-6. PubMed ID: 8827599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Field efficacy of four insect repellent products against vector mosquitoes in a tropical environment.
Yap HH; Jahangir K; Zairi J
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2000 Sep; 16(3):241-4. PubMed ID: 11081653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relative repellency of two formulations of N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (deet) and permethrin-treated clothing against Culex sitiens and Aedes vigilax in Thailand.
Harbach RE; Tang DB; Wirtz RA; Gingrich JB
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1990 Dec; 6(4):641-4. PubMed ID: 2098470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laboratory and field evaluation of insect repellents as larvicides against the mosquitoes Aedes albopictus and Anopheles albimanus.
Xue RD; Barnard DR; Ali A
Med Vet Entomol; 2001 Dec; 15(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 11776456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laboratory and field evaluation of SS220 and deet against mosquitoes in Queensland, Australia.
Frances SP; Mackenzie DO; Klun JA; Debboun M
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2009 Jun; 25(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 19653499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single blinded semi-field evaluation of MAÏA
Mbuba E; Odufuwa OG; Tenywa FC; Philipo R; Tambwe MM; Swai JK; Moore JD; Moore SJ
Malar J; 2021 Jan; 20(1):12. PubMed ID: 33407496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repellent efficacy of DEET, MyggA, neem (Azedirachta indica) oil and chinaberry (Melia azedarach) oil against Anopheles arabiensis, the principal malaria vector in Ethiopia.
Abiy E; Gebre-Michael T; Balkew M; Medhin G
Malar J; 2015 May; 14():187. PubMed ID: 25935845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of repellent products against caged and free flying Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes.
Trongtokit Y; Curtis CF; Rongsriyam Y
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2005 Nov; 36(6):1423-31. PubMed ID: 16610644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative resistance of Anopheles albimanus and Aedes aegypti to N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (Deet) and 2-methylpiperidinyl-3-cyclohexen-1-carboxamide (AI3-37220) in laboratory human-volunteer repellent assays.
Klun JA; Strickman D; Rowton E; Williams J; Kramer M; Roberts D; Debboun M
J Med Entomol; 2004 May; 41(3):418-22. PubMed ID: 15185944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
