These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8827918)

  • 1. Consonant recognition performance of hearing-impaired listeners using one linear and three nonlinear hearing aids.
    Sammeth CA; Tetzeli M; Ochs MT
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1996 Aug; 7(4):240-50. PubMed ID: 8827918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of reducing low-frequency amplification on consonant perception in quiet and noise.
    Gordon-Salant S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Dec; 27(4):483-93. PubMed ID: 6521454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of acoustic modification on consonant recognition by elderly hearing-impaired subjects.
    Gordon-Salant S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Apr; 81(4):1199-202. PubMed ID: 3571732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors governing speech reception benefits of adaptive linear filtering for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Rankovic CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):1043-57. PubMed ID: 9479758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression for school-age children with moderate to moderately severe hearing loss.
    Wolfe J; John A; Schafer E; Nyffeler M; Boretzki M; Caraway T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(10):618-28. PubMed ID: 21376003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of nonlinear frequency compression on speech identification in children with hearing loss.
    Hillock-Dunn A; Buss E; Duncan N; Roush PA; Leibold LJ
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 24496288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving audibility with nonlinear amplification for listeners with high-frequency loss.
    Souza PE; Bishop RD
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Apr; 11(4):214-23. PubMed ID: 10783924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of wideband frequency responses and nonlinear frequency compression for children with cookie-bite audiometric configurations.
    John A; Wolfe J; Scollie S; Schafer E; Hudson M; Woods W; Wheeler J; Hudgens K; Neumann S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014; 25(10):1022-33. PubMed ID: 25514454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived speech quality.
    Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):420-36. PubMed ID: 20440116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of consonant-vowel amplitude ratio in the recognition of voiceless stop consonants by listeners with hearing impairment.
    Sammeth CA; Dorman MF; Stearns CJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Feb; 42(1):42-55. PubMed ID: 10025542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Strategies for enhancing the consonant to vowel intensity ratio with in the ear hearing aids.
    Preves DA; Fortune TW; Woodruff B; Newton J
    Ear Hear; 1991 Dec; 12(6 Suppl):139S-153S. PubMed ID: 1794641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experiments with classroom FM amplification.
    Boothroyd A; Iglehart F
    Ear Hear; 1998 Jun; 19(3):202-17. PubMed ID: 9657595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise.
    Nishi K; Trevino AC; Rosado Rogers L; García P; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e292-e304. PubMed ID: 28353522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship between listening conditions and alternative amplification schemes for multiple memory hearing aids.
    Keidser G
    Ear Hear; 1995 Dec; 16(6):575-86. PubMed ID: 8747807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using multichannel wide-dynamic range compression in severely hearing-impaired listeners: effects on speech recognition and quality.
    Souza PE; Jenstad LM; Folino R
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):120-31. PubMed ID: 15809540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consonant perception with linear and compression amplification.
    Hickson L; Dodd B; Byrne D
    Scand Audiol; 1995; 24(3):175-84. PubMed ID: 8552977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consonant enhancement effects on speech recognition of hearing-impaired children.
    Smith LZ; Levitt H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1999 Sep; 10(8):411-21. PubMed ID: 10813641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.