These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8827918)

  • 61. The Carhart Memorial Lecture, American Auditory Society, Salt Lake City, Utah 1996. Phoneme and word recognition for words in isolation and in sentences.
    Olsen WO; Van Tasell DJ; Speaks CE
    Ear Hear; 1997 Jun; 18(3):175-88. PubMed ID: 9201453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Older listeners' use of temporal cues altered by compression amplification.
    Souza PE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Jun; 43(3):661-74. PubMed ID: 10877436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):165-85. PubMed ID: 15809543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.
    Calandruccio L; Doherty KA; Carney LH; Kikkeri HN
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):512-23. PubMed ID: 17609613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Consequences of broad auditory filters for identification of multichannel-compressed vowels.
    Souza P; Wright R; Bor S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Apr; 55(2):474-86. PubMed ID: 22207696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Speech recognition by normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners as a function of intensity resolution.
    Loizou PC; Dorman M; Poroy O; Spahr T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Nov; 108(5 Pt 1):2377-87. PubMed ID: 11108378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Use of the California Consonant Test in evaluating hearing aids.
    Edgerton BJ; Danhauer JL; Simmons FJ
    Am J Otol; 1986 Mar; 7(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 3963153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Quantifying the contribution of audibility to recognition of compression-amplified speech.
    Souza PE; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 10037062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Evaluation of hearing-impaired listeners using a Nonsense-syllable Test. II. Syllable recognition and consonant confusion patterns.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Langhofer LR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Mar; 25(1):141-8. PubMed ID: 7087417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Evaluation of the effects of nonlinear frequency compression on speech recognition and sound quality for adults with mild to moderate hearing loss.
    Picou EM; Marcrum SC; Ricketts TA
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Mar; 54(3):162-9. PubMed ID: 25731581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Examination of the neighborhood activation theory in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dirks DD; Takayanagi S; Moshfegh A; Noffsinger PD; Fausti SA
    Ear Hear; 2001 Feb; 22(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11271971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Speech recognition ability in noise and its relationship to perceived hearing aid benefit.
    Cord MT; Leek MR; Walden BE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Oct; 11(9):475-83. PubMed ID: 11057731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Comparison of a programmable 3-channel compression hearing system with single-channel AGC instruments.
    Kiessling J; Steffens T
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():67-74. PubMed ID: 8153566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Effects of three amplification strategies on speech perception by children with severe and profound hearing loss.
    Marriage JE; Moore BC; Stone MA; Baer T
    Ear Hear; 2005 Feb; 26(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 15692303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. An examination of the practicality of the simplex procedure.
    Preminger JE; Neuman AC; Bakke MH; Walters D; Levitt H
    Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):177-93. PubMed ID: 10890726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Effects of Slow- and Fast-Acting Compression on Hearing-Impaired Listeners' Consonant-Vowel Identification in Interrupted Noise.
    Kowalewski B; Zaar J; Fereczkowski M; MacDonald EN; Strelcyk O; May T; Dau T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518800870. PubMed ID: 30311552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Comparison of hearing aids over the 20th century.
    Bentler RA; Duve MR
    Ear Hear; 2000 Dec; 21(6):625-39. PubMed ID: 11132788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Consonant recognition and confusion patterns among elderly hearing-impaired subjects.
    Gordon-Salant S
    Ear Hear; 1987 Oct; 8(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 3678640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Study of the long-term effects of frequency compression by behavioral verbal tests in adults.
    Marchesin VC; Iório MC
    Codas; 2015; 27(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 25885195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.