These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8828975)

  • 1. Dipole theory and electroencephalography.
    Niedermeyer E
    Clin Electroencephalogr; 1996 Jul; 27(3):121-31. PubMed ID: 8828975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EEG source localization.
    Michel CM; He B
    Handb Clin Neurol; 2019; 160():85-101. PubMed ID: 31277878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Precision of dipole localization in a spherical volume conductor: a comparison of referential EEG, magnetoencephalography and scalp current density methods.
    Murro AM; Smith JR; King DW; Park YD
    Brain Topogr; 1995; 8(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 8793122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hyperedge bundling: A practical solution to spurious interactions in MEG/EEG source connectivity analyses.
    Wang SH; Lobier M; Siebenhühner F; Puoliväli T; Palva S; Palva JM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():610-622. PubMed ID: 29378318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Demonstration of useful differences between magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram.
    Cohen D; Cuffin BN
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1983 Jul; 56(1):38-51. PubMed ID: 6190632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Source localization of EEG versus MEG: empirical comparison using visually evoked responses and theoretical considerations.
    Lopes da Silva FH; Wieringa HJ; Peters MJ
    Brain Topogr; 1991; 4(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 1793687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Array response kernels for EEG and MEG in multilayer ellipsoidal geometry.
    Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1103-11. PubMed ID: 18334402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Models of source currents in the brain.
    Ilmoniemi RJ
    Brain Topogr; 1993; 5(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 8357703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the properties of EEG and MEG in detecting the electric activity of the brain.
    Malmivuo J
    Brain Topogr; 2012 Jan; 25(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 21912974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
    Engemann DA; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization.
    Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 May; 86(5):303-21. PubMed ID: 7685264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confidence limits of dipole source reconstruction results.
    Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jun; 115(6):1442-51. PubMed ID: 15134713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring the cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity with EEG and MEG.
    Siems M; Pape AA; Hipp JF; Siegel M
    Neuroimage; 2016 Apr; 129():345-355. PubMed ID: 26827813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A technique to consider mismatches between fMRI and EEG/MEG sources for fMRI-constrained EEG/MEG source imaging: a preliminary simulation study.
    Im CH; Lee SY
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(23):6005-21. PubMed ID: 17110766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
    Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography.
    Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Effect of boundary element discretization on forward calculation and the inverse problem in electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography].
    Haueisen J; Böttner A; Funke M; Brauer H; Nowak H
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997 Sep; 42(9):240-8. PubMed ID: 9410154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A random dipole model for spontaneous brain activity.
    de Munck JC; Vijn PC; Lopes da Silva FH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Aug; 39(8):791-804. PubMed ID: 1505993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.