These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8831296)

  • 1. An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: interactive effects of outcomes and procedures.
    Brockner J; Wiesenfeld BM
    Psychol Bull; 1996 Sep; 120(2):189-208. PubMed ID: 8831296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trust in decision-making authorities dictates the form of the interactive relationship between outcome fairness and procedural fairness.
    Bianchi EC; Brockner J; van den Bos K; Seifert M; Moon H; van Dijke M; De Cremer D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Jan; 41(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 25387762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.
    Colquitt JA; Conlon DE; Wesson MJ; Porter CO; Ng KY
    J Appl Psychol; 2001 Jun; 86(3):425-45. PubMed ID: 11419803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Four-factor justice and daily job satisfaction: a multilevel investigation.
    Loi R; Yang J; Diefendorff JM
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 May; 94(3):770-81. PubMed ID: 19450012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When do procedural fairness and outcome fairness interact to influence employees' work attitudes and behaviors? The moderating effect of uncertainty.
    De Cremer D; Brockner J; Fishman A; van Dijke M; van Olffen W; Mayer DM
    J Appl Psychol; 2010 Mar; 95(2):291-304. PubMed ID: 20230070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A longitudinal analysis of organizational fairness: an examination of reactions to tenure and promotion decisions.
    Ambrose ML; Cropanzano R
    J Appl Psychol; 2003 Apr; 88(2):266-75. PubMed ID: 12731710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Uncertainty management: the influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness.
    van den Bos K
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Jun; 80(6):931-41. PubMed ID: 11414375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Justice orientation as a moderator of the framing effect on procedural justice perception.
    Sasaki H; Hayashi Y
    J Soc Psychol; 2014; 154(3):251-63. PubMed ID: 24873027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survivor reactions to reorganization: antecedents and consequences of procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice.
    Kernan MC; Hanges PJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Oct; 87(5):916-28. PubMed ID: 12395816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Moderating the interaction between procedural justice and decision frame: the counterbalancing effect of personality traits.
    Sasaki H; Hayashi Y
    J Psychol; 2013; 147(2):125-51. PubMed ID: 23469475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wellness as fairness.
    Prilleltensky I
    Am J Community Psychol; 2012 Mar; 49(1-2):1-21. PubMed ID: 21643926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decision frame and procedural justice: interactive effects on perceptions of distributive justice.
    Flint DH; Cole ND
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Oct; 93(2):631-7. PubMed ID: 14650697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of societal benefits and fairness concerns among decision makers and decision recipients.
    Heuer L; Penrod S; Kattan A
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Dec; 31(6):573-610. PubMed ID: 17245632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fairness and health care decision making: testing the group value model of procedural justice.
    Murphy-Berman V; Cross T; Fondacaro M
    Soc Justice Res; 1999 Jun; 12(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 12564443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of role and gender on the use of distributive versus procedural justice principles.
    Tata J
    J Psychol; 2000 May; 134(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 10907704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fairness heuristics and substitutability effects: inferring the fairness of outcomes, procedures, and interpersonal treatment when employees lack clear information.
    Qin X; Ren R; Zhang ZX; Johnson RE
    J Appl Psychol; 2015 May; 100(3):749-66. PubMed ID: 25365727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reactions to decisions with uncertain consequences: reliance on perceived fairness versus predicted outcomes depends on knowledge.
    See KE
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jan; 96(1):104-18. PubMed ID: 19210067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Justice as a dynamic construct: effects of individual trajectories on distal work outcomes.
    Hausknecht JP; Sturman MC; Roberson QM
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Jul; 96(4):872-80. PubMed ID: 21443314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Procedural fairness, outcome favorability, and judgments of an authority's responsibility.
    Brockner J; Fishman AY; Reb J; Goldman B; Spiegel S; Garden C
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Nov; 92(6):1657-71. PubMed ID: 18020803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Organizational justice and health; review of evidence.
    Elovainio M; Heponiemi T; Sinervo T; Magnavita N
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2010; 32(3 Suppl B):B5-9. PubMed ID: 21299075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.