These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8833141)

  • 1. Mechanical defects in dental enamel vs. natural dental caries: observer differentiation using Ektaspeed Plus film.
    Kang B-C ; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Caries Res; 1996; 30(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 8833141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Observer differentiation of proximal enamel mechanical defects versus natural proximal dental caries with computed dental radiography.
    Kang BC; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Oct; 82(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 8899789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Observer differentiation of mechanical defects versus natural dental caries cavitations on monitor-displayed images with imaging plate readout.
    Kang BC; Goldsmith LJ; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Nov; 86(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 9830655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. RVG-S, VIXA, and Ektaspeed film in detection of proximal enamel defects under orthodontic bands.
    Reichl P; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 8678348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of tube potential and image receptor on the detection of natural proximal caries in primary teeth.
    Sogur E; Baksı BG; Orhan K; Paksoy SC; Dogan S; Erdal YS; Mert A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Dec; 15(6):901-7. PubMed ID: 20838834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing the performance of storage phosphor plate and Insight film images for the detection of proximal caries depth.
    Crombie K; Parker ME; Nortje CJ; Sanderink GC
    SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):452, 454-6, 458-9. PubMed ID: 20306863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A pilot study of a modified radiographic technique for detecting early proximal cavities.
    Akbari M; Zarch HH; Movagharipour F; Ahrari F
    Caries Res; 2013; 47(6):612-6. PubMed ID: 24061285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
    Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
    Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
    Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An in-vitro evaluation of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus film with a CMOS detector for natural proximal caries: ROC analysis.
    Nair MK; Nair UP
    Caries Res; 2001; 35(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 11641571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The efficacy of caries detection using three intraoral films under different processing conditions.
    Ludlow JB; Platin E; Delano EO; Clifton L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 128(10):1401-8. PubMed ID: 9332141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of sensitometric and diagnostic performance of two films.
    White SC; Yoon DC
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2000 Jun; 21(6):530-2, 534, 536 passim. PubMed ID: 11199671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vivo study of approximal caries depth on storage phosphor plate images compared with dental x-ray film.
    Versteeg KH; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):210-3. PubMed ID: 9269024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variations among dentists in radiographic detection of occlusal caries.
    Espelid I; Tveit AB; Fjelltveit A
    Caries Res; 1994; 28(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 8033190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C
    Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of radiographic detection of residual caries in connection with tunnel restorations.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hörsted-Bindslev P
    Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 9438567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The ADEPT study: a comparative study of dentists' ability to detect enamel-only proximal caries in bitewing radiographs with and without the use of AssistDent artificial intelligence software.
    Devlin H; Williams T; Graham J; Ashley M
    Br Dent J; 2021 Oct; 231(8):481-485. PubMed ID: 34686815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries.
    Janhom A; van Ginkel FC; van Amerongen JP; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 11420630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of Kodak Ultraspeed and Ektaspeed plus dental X-ray films for the detection of dental caries.
    Wong A; Monsour PA; Moule AJ; Basford KE
    Aust Dent J; 2002 Mar; 47(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 12035954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of a film-based and a direct digital dental radiographic system using a proximal caries model.
    Price C; Ergül N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 9446990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.