BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8833466)

  • 1. Evaluation of a human patch test for the identification and classification of skin irritation potential.
    York M; Griffiths HA; Whittle E; Basketter DA
    Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Mar; 34(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 8833466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surfactant-induced skin irritation and skin repair: evaluation of a cumulative human irritation model by noninvasive techniques.
    Wilhelm KP; Freitag G; Wolff HH
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1994 Dec; 31(6):981-7. PubMed ID: 7962781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perfluoropolyethers in the prevention of irritant contact dermatitis.
    Elsner P; Wigger-Alberti W; Pantini G
    Dermatology; 1998; 197(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 9732163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Skin irritation testing in man for hazard assessment--evaluation of four patch systems.
    York M; Basketter DA; Cuthbert JA; Neilson L
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 1995 Sep; 14(9):729-34. PubMed ID: 8579884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Petrolatum prevents irritation in a human cumulative exposure model in vivo.
    Wigger-Alberti W; Elsner P
    Dermatology; 1997; 194(3):247-50. PubMed ID: 9187842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of a 4-h human patch test method for comparative and investigative assessment of skin irritation.
    Robinson MK; Perkins MA; Basketter DA
    Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Apr; 38(4):194-202. PubMed ID: 9565290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of irritation and corrosion hazards to skin: an alternative strategy to animal testing.
    Basketter DA; Whittle E; Chamberlain M
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1994 Jun; 32(6):539-42. PubMed ID: 8045460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recurrent flexural pellagroid dermatitis: an unusual variant of irritant contact dermatitis.
    Segal R; Eskin-Schwartz M; Trattner A; Feinmesser M; Hodak E; Ingber A; David M
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2015 Jan; 95(1):116-7. PubMed ID: 24696128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The identification and classification of skin irritation hazard by a human patch test.
    Basketter DA; Whittle E; Griffiths HA; York M
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1994 Aug; 32(8):769-75. PubMed ID: 8070741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the medical devices benchmark materials in the controlled human patch testing and in the RhE in vitro skin irritation protocol.
    Kandárová H; Bendova H; Letasiova S; Coleman KP; De Jong WH; Jírova D
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2018 Aug; 50():433-438. PubMed ID: 29462660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An arm immersion model of compromised skin (I). Influence on irritation reactions.
    Allenby CF; Basketter DA; Dickens A; Barnes EG; Brough HC
    Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Feb; 28(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 8458223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of in vivo (Draize method) and in vitro (Corrositex assay) dermal corrosion values for selected industrial chemicals.
    Stobbe JL; Drake KD; Maier KJ
    Int J Toxicol; 2003; 22(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 12745991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a tiered in vitro testing strategy for assessing the ocular and dermal irritation/corrosion potential of pharmaceutical compounds for worker safety.
    Graham JC; Wilt N; Costin GE; Villano C; Bader J; Krawiec L; Sly E; Gould J
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2018 Dec; 37(4):380-390. PubMed ID: 30035615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative assessment of the acute skin irritation potential of detergent formulations using a novel human 4-h patch test method.
    Robinson MK; Kruszewski FH; Al-Atrash J; Blazka ME; Gingell R; Heitfeld FA; Mallon D; Snyder NK; Swanson JE; Casterton PL
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2005 Dec; 43(12):1703-12. PubMed ID: 16026914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intra-individual variation of irritant threshold and relationship to transepidermal water loss measurement of skin irritation.
    Smith HR; Rowson M; Basketter DA; McFadden JP
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 15291829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of skin irritation potential in the human 4-h patch test.
    Basketter DA; York M; McFadden JP; Robinson MK
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 15291823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity and ethics of the human 4-h patch test as an alternative method to assess acute skin irritation potential.
    Robinson MK; McFadden JP; Basketter DA
    Contact Dermatitis; 2001 Jul; 45(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 11422260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in classification for skin corrosion/irritation in EU and Ukraine: Case study of alternative (in vitro and in silico) methods application for classification of pesticide active ingredient imazamox.
    Kolesnyk S; Bubalo N; Prodanchuk M; Zhminko P
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2019 Oct; 60():71-75. PubMed ID: 31100379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surfactant-induced skin irritation and skin repair. Evaluation of the acute human irritation model by noninvasive techniques.
    Wilhelm KP; Freitag G; Wolff HH
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1994 Jun; 30(6):944-9. PubMed ID: 8188884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An open assay model to induce subclincal non-erythematous irritation.
    Charbonnier V; Morrison BM; Paye M; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Apr; 42(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 10750851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.