179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8833870)
41. Diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and human papillomavirus infection: punch biopsy versus cervical smear.
Gitsch G; Reinthaller A; Tatra G; Breitenecker G
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1991; 249(4):179-84. PubMed ID: 1665685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Discordance between cytologic and histologic reports in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Results of a one-year audit.
Rasbridge SA; Nayagam M
Acta Cytol; 1995; 39(4):648-53. PubMed ID: 7631537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. 'See and treat' electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone.
Ferris DG; Hainer BL; Pfenninger JL; Zuber TJ
J Fam Pract; 1996 Mar; 42(3):253-7. PubMed ID: 8636676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The role of human papillomavirus testing in the management of women with low-grade abnormalities: multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Cotton S; Sharp L; Little J; Cruickshank M; Seth R; Smart L; Duncan I; Harrild K; Neal K; Waugh N;
BJOG; 2010 May; 117(6):645-59. PubMed ID: 20374607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Invasive cancer of the cervix in women with mild dyskaryosis followed up cytologically.
Soutter WP; Fletcher A
BMJ; 1994 May; 308(6941):1421-3. PubMed ID: 8019256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Colposcopy in a family planning clinic: a future model?
Kitchener HC; Burnett RA; Wilson ES; Cordiner JW
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 May; 294(6583):1313-5. PubMed ID: 3109632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Cytological follow-up of women older than 50 years with high-grade cervical smear treated by large loop excision.
Das N; Sutton V; Bevan J; Brinkmann D; Woolas R
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jul; 13(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 19550214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Pregnancy related cervical cytological changes and clinical management].
Ma L; Bian ML; Liu J; Wang XH; Pang CH; Chen Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):84-7. PubMed ID: 21426763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Cyto-colpo-histologic correlation: about an analytical study of 120 colposcopies.
Slimani O; Ben Temim R; Makhlouf T; Mathlouthi N; Attia L
Tunis Med; 2016 Oct; 94(8-9):616-620. PubMed ID: 28685798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Conservative treatment of low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) of the cervix.
Lee SS; Collins RJ; Pun TC; Cheng DK; Ngan HY
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1998 Jan; 60(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9506412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A retrospective study of cervical screening in women under 25 years (2005-2009).
Ali AA; Richardson D; Hill N
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 287(4):765-9. PubMed ID: 23183714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Colposcopic management of high-grade referral smears: a retrospective audit supporting 'see and treat'?
Errington CA; Roberts M; Tindle P; Michael E; Bulmer JN; Wadehra V
Cytopathology; 2006 Dec; 17(6):339-47. PubMed ID: 17168916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Is human papillomavirus testing an effective triage method for detection of high-grade (grade 2 or 3) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?
Adam E; Kaufman RH; Berkova Z; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 178(6):1235-44. PubMed ID: 9662307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A comparison of the reliability of repeat cervical smears and colposcopy in patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
Mayeaux EJ; Harper MB; Abreo F; Pope JB; Phillips GS
J Fam Pract; 1995 Jan; 40(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 7807039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The increased detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia when using a second biopsy at colposcopy.
van der Marel J; van Baars R; Rodriguez A; Quint WG; van de Sandt MM; Berkhof J; Schiffman M; Torné A; Ordi J; Jenkins D; Verheijen RH; Helmerhorst TJ; Ter Harmsel B; Wentzensen N; Del Pino M
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Nov; 135(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 25204846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Accuracy of cytological findings in abnormal cervical smears by cytohistologic comparison.
Mostafa MG; Srivannaboon S; Rachanawutanon M
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2000 Jan; 43(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 12583415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The value of cervical cytology in HIV-infected women.
Del Priore G; Maag T; Bhattacharya M; Garcia PM; Till M; Lurain JR
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Mar; 56(3):395-8. PubMed ID: 7705674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Human papillomavirus testing as triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness.
Kaufman RH; Adam E; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 9369847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Use of semi-quantitative PCR for human papillomavirus DNA type 16 to identify women with high grade cervical disease in a population presenting with a mildly dyskaryotic smear report.
Bavin PJ; Giles JA; Deery A; Crow J; Griffiths PD; Emery VC; Walker PG
Br J Cancer; 1993 Mar; 67(3):602-5. PubMed ID: 8382513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Relation of human papillomavirus status to cervical lesions and consequences for cervical-cancer screening: a prospective study.
Nobbenhuis MA; Walboomers JM; Helmerhorst TJ; Rozendaal L; Remmink AJ; Risse EK; van der Linden HC; Voorhorst FJ; Kenemans P; Meijer CJ
Lancet; 1999 Jul; 354(9172):20-5. PubMed ID: 10406360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
