190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8836058)
1. Consistency of AO fracture classification for the distal radius.
Kreder HJ; Hanel DP; McKee M; Jupiter J; McGillivary G; Swiontkowski MF
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1996 Sep; 78(5):726-31. PubMed ID: 8836058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is it time to revisit the AO classification of fractures of the distal radius? Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the AO classification.
Plant CE; Hickson C; Hedley H; Parsons NR; Costa ML
Bone Joint J; 2015 Jun; 97-B(6):818-23. PubMed ID: 26033063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Distal radius fractures are difficult to classify.
Wæver D; Madsen ML; Rölfing JHD; Borris LC; Henriksen M; Nagel LL; Thorninger R
Injury; 2018 Jun; 49 Suppl 1():S29-S32. PubMed ID: 29929689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The comparative study of reliability and reproducibility of distal radius' fracture classification among: AO frykman and Fernandez classification systems.
Siripakarn Y; Niempoog S; Boontanapibul K
J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 Jan; 96(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 23720978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does the CT improve inter- and intra-observer agreement for the AO, Fernandez and Universal classification systems for distal radius fractures?
Arealis G; Galanopoulos I; Nikolaou VS; Lacon A; Ashwood N; Kitsis C
Injury; 2014 Oct; 45(10):1579-84. PubMed ID: 25042062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Surface width index of the distal radius joint surface].
Fischmeister MF; Foltin E
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 1991 Jan; 23(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 2032628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the reliability of classification systems used for distal radius fractures.
Kural C; Sungur I; Kaya I; Ugras A; Ertürk A; Cetinus E
Orthopedics; 2010 Nov; 33(11):801. PubMed ID: 21053882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the cooney classification of distal radius fractures between experienced orthopaedic surgeons.
Jin WJ; Jiang LS; Shen L; Lu H; Cui YM; Zhou Q; Dai LY
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2007 Oct; 32(5):509-11. PubMed ID: 17950210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of simplified Frykman and AO classifications of fractures of the distal radius. Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver agreement.
Illarramendi A; González Della Valle A; Segal E; De Carli P; Maignon G; Gallucci G
Int Orthop; 1998; 22(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 9651777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Four distal radial fracture classification systems tested amongst a large panel of Dutch trauma surgeons.
Ploegmakers JJ; Mader K; Pennig D; Verheyen CC
Injury; 2007 Nov; 38(11):1268-72. PubMed ID: 17643439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Distal radius fractures: consistency of the classifications].
de Oliveira Filho OM; Belangero WD; Teles JB
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2004; 50(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 15253028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Classification of distal radius fractures: an analysis of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility.
Andersen DJ; Blair WF; Steyers CM; Adams BD; el-Khouri GY; Brandser EA
J Hand Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 21(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 8842946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the Fernandez classification for distal radius fractures.
Naqvi SG; Reynolds T; Kitsis C
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2009 Aug; 34(4):483-5. PubMed ID: 19321533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and validation of the AO pediatric comprehensive classification of long bone fractures by the Pediatric Expert Group of the AO Foundation in collaboration with AO Clinical Investigation and Documentation and the International Association for Pediatric Traumatology.
Slongo T; Audigé L; Schlickewei W; Clavert JM; Hunter J;
J Pediatr Orthop; 2006; 26(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 16439900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wrist fractures from snowboarding: a prospective study for 3 seasons from 1998 to 2001.
Matsumoto K; Sumi H; Sumi Y; Shimizu K
Clin J Sport Med; 2004 Mar; 14(2):64-71. PubMed ID: 15014339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of different radiography systems in an experimental study for detection of forearm fractures and evaluation of the Müller-AO and Frykman classification for distal radius fractures.
Metz S; Kuhn V; Kettler M; Hudelmaier M; Bonel HM; Waldt S; Hollweck R; Renger B; Rummeny EJ; Link TM
Invest Radiol; 2006 Sep; 41(9):681-90. PubMed ID: 16896303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are distal radius fracture classifications reproducible? Intra and interobserver agreement.
Belloti JC; Tamaoki MJ; Franciozi CE; Santos JB; Balbachevsky D; Chap Chap E; Albertoni WM; Faloppa F
Sao Paulo Med J; 2008 May; 126(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 18711658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interobserver reliability of radial head fracture classification: two-dimensional compared with three-dimensional CT.
Guitton TG; Ring D;
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Nov; 93(21):2015-21. PubMed ID: 22048097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Classification of distal radius fractures in children: good inter- and intraobserver reliability, which improves with clinical experience.
Randsborg PH; Sivertsen EA
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 Jan; 13():6. PubMed ID: 22269925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Internal fixation of pilon fractures of the distal radius.
Trumble TE; Schmitt SR; Vedder NB
Yale J Biol Med; 1993; 66(3):179-91. PubMed ID: 8209554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
