125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8837276)
1. A cost minimization approach to the diagnosis of skeletal neoplasms.
Ruhs SA; el-Khoury GY; Chrischilles EA
Skeletal Radiol; 1996 Jul; 25(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 8837276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis and management of bone lesions: a study of 450 cases.
Bommer KK; Ramzy I; Mody D
Cancer; 1997 Jun; 81(3):148-56. PubMed ID: 9196013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of fine needle aspiration for solid breast lesions is accurate and cost-effective.
Rubin M; Horiuchi K; Joy N; Haun W; Read R; Ratzer E; Fenoglio M
Am J Surg; 1997 Dec; 174(6):694-6; discussion 697-8. PubMed ID: 9409599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy and charge-savings of outpatient core needle biopsy compared with open biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors.
Skrzynski MC; Biermann JS; Montag A; Simon MA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 May; 78(5):644-9. PubMed ID: 8642019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The cost of diagnosis: a comparison of four different strategies in the workup of solitary radiographic lung lesions.
Goldberg-Kahn B; Healy JC; Bishop JW
Chest; 1997 Apr; 111(4):870-6. PubMed ID: 9106563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the costs of fine-needle aspiration and open surgical biopsy as methods for obtaining a pathologic diagnosis.
Rimm DL; Stastny JF; Rimm EB; Ayer S; Frable WJ
Cancer; 1997 Feb; 81(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 9100542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CT-guided fine needle aspiration and needle core biopsy of skeletal lesions. Complementary diagnostic techniques.
Koscick RL; Petersilge CA; Makley JT; Abdul-Karim FW
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(3):697-702. PubMed ID: 9622690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A cost-minimization analysis of alternative strategies in diagnosing pancreatic cancer.
Chen VK; Arguedas MR; Kilgore ML; Eloubeidi MA
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Nov; 99(11):2223-34. PubMed ID: 15555006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic core needle biopsy: analysis by means of mammographic findings.
Lee CH; Egglin TK; Philpotts L; Mainiero MB; Tocino I
Radiology; 1997 Mar; 202(3):849-54. PubMed ID: 9051045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of primary bone tumors.
Ward WG; Kilpatrick S
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2000 Apr; (373):80-7. PubMed ID: 10810465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Large-core needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration biopsy in solid breast lesions: comparison of costs and diagnostic value.
Vimpeli SM; Saarenmaa I; Huhtala H; Soimakallio S
Acta Radiol; 2008 Oct; 49(8):863-9. PubMed ID: 18618302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-minimization analysis of alternative diagnostic approaches in a modeled patient with non-small cell lung cancer and subcarinal lymphadenopathy.
Harewood GC; Wiersema MJ; Edell ES; Liebow M
Mayo Clin Proc; 2002 Feb; 77(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 11838649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Percutaneous needle biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions. 2. Cost-effectiveness.
Fraser-Hill MA; Renfrew DL; Hilsenrath PE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Apr; 158(4):813-8. PubMed ID: 1546598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost minimization analysis of ultrasound-guided diagnostic evaluation of probably benign breast lesions.
Lee CI; Wells CJ; Bassett LW
Breast J; 2013; 19(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 23186174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Percutaneous guided biopsy for diagnosing suspected primary malignant bone tumors in pediatric patients: a safe, accurate, and cost-saving procedure.
Ceraulo A; Ouziel A; Lavergne E; Perrier L; Decouvelaere AV; Chotel F; Thiesse P; Marec-Berard P
Pediatr Radiol; 2017 Feb; 47(2):235-244. PubMed ID: 27942776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The palpable breast nodule. A cost-effectiveness analysis of alternate diagnostic approaches.
Layfield LJ; Chrischilles EA; Cohen MB; Bottles K
Cancer; 1993 Sep; 72(5):1642-51. PubMed ID: 8348496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effective use of breast biopsy techniques in a Veterans health care system.
Hatmaker AR; Donahue RM; Tarpley JL; Pearson AS
Am J Surg; 2006 Nov; 192(5):e37-41. PubMed ID: 17071179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing the cost-effectiveness of the triple test score to traditional methods for evaluating palpable breast masses.
Morris AM; Flowers CR; Morris KT; Schmidt WA; Pommier RF; Vetto JT
Med Care; 2003 Aug; 41(8):962-71. PubMed ID: 12886175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Percutaneous skeletal aspiration and core biopsy: complementary techniques.
Schweitzer ME; Gannon FH; Deely DM; O'Hara BJ; Juneja V
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Feb; 166(2):415-8. PubMed ID: 8553958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pretherapeutic evaluation of patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancer using endoscopic and laparoscopic ultrasonography.
Mortensen MB
Dan Med J; 2012 Dec; 59(12):B4568. PubMed ID: 23290296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
