These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8837394)

  • 1. Comparison of BBL Crystal ANR ID Kit and API rapid ID 32 A for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Moll WM; Ungerechts J; Marklein G; Schaal KP
    Zentralbl Bakteriol; 1996 Jul; 284(2-3):329-47. PubMed ID: 8837394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Crystal Enteric/Nonfermenter system, API 20E system, and Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.
    Robinson A; McCarter YS; Tetreault J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Feb; 33(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 7714193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative evaluation of a commercial system for identification of gram-positive cocci.
    von Baum H; Klemme FR; Geiss HK; Sonntag HG
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1998 Dec; 17(12):849-52. PubMed ID: 10052548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of two BBL Crystal systems for identification of some clinically important gram-negative bacteria.
    Holmes B; Costas M; Thaker T; Stevens M
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Sep; 32(9):2221-4. PubMed ID: 7814550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rapid enzymatic characterization of clinically encountered anaerobic bacteria with the API ZYM system.
    Marler L; Allen S; Siders J
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Aug; 3(4):294-300. PubMed ID: 6386457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of PRAS II, RapID ANA, and API 20A systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Karachewski NO; Busch EL; Wells CL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jan; 21(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 3881468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of RapID ANA and API 20 A for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Summanen P; Jousimies-Somer H
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1988 Dec; 7(6):771-5. PubMed ID: 3145860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the Velogene Rapid MRSA Identification Assay, Denka MRSA-Screen Assay, and BBL Crystal MRSA ID System for rapid identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
    Arbique J; Forward K; Haldane D; Davidson R
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2001; 40(1-2):5-10. PubMed ID: 11448557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parallel comparison of accuracy of API 20E, Vitek GNI, MicroScan Walk/Away Rapid ID, and Becton Dickinson Cobas Micro ID-E/NF for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and common gram-negative, non-glucose-fermenting bacilli.
    O'Hara CM; Tenover FC; Miller JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Dec; 31(12):3165-9. PubMed ID: 8308108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study of the BBL crystal enteric/nonfermenter identification system and the biomerieux API20E and API20NE identification systems after overnight incubation.
    Varettas K; Mukerjee C; Schmidt M
    Pathology; 1995 Oct; 27(4):358-61. PubMed ID: 8771156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Anaerobic bacteria isolated from patients with suspected anaerobic infections].
    Ercis S; Tunçkanat F; Hasçelik G
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2005 Oct; 39(4):447-54. PubMed ID: 16544546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vitek 2 ANC card versus BBL Crystal Anaerobe and RapID ANA II for identification of clinical anaerobic bacteria.
    Blairon L; Maza ML; Wybo I; Piérard D; Dediste A; Vandenberg O
    Anaerobe; 2010 Aug; 16(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 20685292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the BBL Crystal Enteric/Nonfermenter kit for the identification of water-derived environmental Enterobacteriaceae.
    Micklewright IJ; Sartory DP
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 1995 Sep; 21(3):160-3. PubMed ID: 7576500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative evaluation of the Rapid ID 32A kit system, miniaturized standard procedure and a rapid fermentation procedure for the identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Pattyn SR; Ieven M; Buffet L
    Acta Clin Belg; 1993; 48(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 8392248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of the Vitek ANI card for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Schreckenberger PC; Celig DM; Janda WM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Feb; 26(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 3343321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of three identification systems for anaerobes.
    Murray PR; Weber CJ; Niles AC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jul; 22(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 2862161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of clinically isolated vancomycin-resistant enterococci: comparison of API and BBL Crystal systems.
    Hamilton-Miller JMT; Shah S
    J Med Microbiol; 1999 Jul; 48(7):695-696. PubMed ID: 10403421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of three methods for anaerobe identification.
    Appelbaum PC; Kaufmann CS; Keifer JC; Venbrux HJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Sep; 18(3):614-21. PubMed ID: 6355150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of identifications of human and animal source gram-negative bacteria by API 20E and crystal E/NF systems.
    Peele D; Bradfield J; Pryor W; Vore S
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Jan; 35(1):213-6. PubMed ID: 8968910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Characteristic of clinical strains of gram-negative obligate anaerobes].
    Kadzielska J; Kierzkowska M; Sawicka-Grzelak A; Rokosz A; Łuczak M
    Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2007; 59(4):351-7. PubMed ID: 18416127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.