These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8838548)

  • 1. Effect of initial setting on convergence to optimal hearing aid setting using a simplex method.
    Kuk FK; Lau C
    Br J Audiol; 1995 Oct; 29(5):263-9. PubMed ID: 8838548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An examination of the practicality of the simplex procedure.
    Preminger JE; Neuman AC; Bakke MH; Walters D; Levitt H
    Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):177-93. PubMed ID: 10890726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of multi-channel compression time constants on subjectively perceived sound quality and speech intelligibility.
    Hansen M
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):369-80. PubMed ID: 12195179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An application of the articulation index to hearing aid fitting.
    Rankovic CM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):391-402. PubMed ID: 2046364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relationship between listening conditions and alternative amplification schemes for multiple memory hearing aids.
    Keidser G
    Ear Hear; 1995 Dec; 16(6):575-86. PubMed ID: 8747807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Dalzell S; Peterson D; Kopun J; Lewis DL; Hoover BE
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 9562535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of preferred frequency gain settings obtained with category rating and modified simplex procedure.
    Kuk FK; Lau C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1996 Oct; 7(5):322-31. PubMed ID: 8898268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptual consequence of vents in hearing aids.
    Kuk FK
    Br J Audiol; 1991 Jun; 25(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 1873583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A screening procedure for modified simplex in frequency-gain response selection.
    Kuk FK
    Ear Hear; 1994 Feb; 15(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 8194680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prescribed clinician-fit versus as-worn coupler gain in a group of elderly hearing-aid wearers.
    Humes LE; Barlow NN; Garner CB; Wilson DL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 43(4):879-92. PubMed ID: 11386475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preferred listening levels for linear and slow-acting compression hearing aids.
    Neuman AC; Bakke MH; Hellman S; Levitt H
    Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):407-16. PubMed ID: 8549896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The reliability of a modified simplex procedure in hearing aid frequency-response selection.
    Kuk FK; Pape NM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Apr; 35(2):418-29. PubMed ID: 1573880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
    Moore BC; Sęk A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters.
    Zakis JA; Dillon H; McDermott HJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):812-30. PubMed ID: 17982368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing loudness normalization (IHAFF) with speech intelligibility maximization (NAL-NL1) when implemented in a two-channel device.
    Keidser G; Grant F
    Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):501-15. PubMed ID: 11770672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preferred delay and phase-frequency response of open-canal hearing aids with music at low insertion gain.
    Zakis JA; Fulton B; Steele BR
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 51(12):906-13. PubMed ID: 23025794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporary threshold shift caused by hearing aid use.
    Macrae JH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Apr; 36(2):365-72. PubMed ID: 8487528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of three adaptive hearing aid selection strategies.
    Neuman AC; Levitt H; Mills R; Schwander T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Dec; 82(6):1967-76. PubMed ID: 3429734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A digital filterbank hearing aid: predicting user preference and performance for two signal processing algorithms.
    Lunner T; Hellgren J; Arlinger S; Elberling C
    Ear Hear; 1997 Feb; 18(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 9058034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.