These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8838551)

  • 1. Measurement of variability in sound field audiometry due to subject movement.
    Beynon GJ; Munro KJ
    Br J Audiol; 1995 Oct; 29(5):285-91. PubMed ID: 8838551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of head movement and head positioning on sound field audiometry.
    Shaw P; Greenwood H
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jun; 51(6):499-504. PubMed ID: 22486395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Amplitude variation in calibrated audiometer systems in clinical simulations.
    Barlow C; Davison L; Ashmore M; Weinstein R
    Noise Health; 2014; 16(72):299-305. PubMed ID: 25209040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sound field audiometry: recommended stimuli and procedures.
    Walker G; Dillon H; Byrne D
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 6706021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Smartphone hearing screening with integrated quality control and data management.
    Swanepoel de W; Myburgh HC; Howe DM; Mahomed F; Eikelboom RH
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Dec; 53(12):841-9. PubMed ID: 24998412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement of individual loudness functions by trisection of loudness ranges.
    Villchur E; Killion MC
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):693-703. PubMed ID: 18769270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fixed-Level Frequency Threshold Testing for Ototoxicity Monitoring.
    Rieke CC; Clavier OH; Allen LV; Anderson AP; Brooks CA; Fellows AM; Brungart DS; Buckey JC
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):e369-e375. PubMed ID: 28362673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A probe earmold system for measuring eardrum SPL under hearing-aid conditions.
    Gilman S; Dirks DD
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 6719011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical measures of hearing aid directivity: assumption, accuracy, and reliability.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 21826003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability in warble-tone sound field audiometry.
    Arlinger SD; Jerlvall LB
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 3589476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noise in magnetic resonance imaging: no risk for sensorineural function but increased amplitude variability of otoacoustic emissions.
    Wagner W; Staud I; Frank G; Dammann F; Plontke S; Plinkert PK
    Laryngoscope; 2003 Jul; 113(7):1216-23. PubMed ID: 12838022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of reference microphone placement on sound pressure levels at an ear level hearing aid microphone.
    Feigin JA; Barlow NL; Stelmachowicz PG
    Ear Hear; 1990 Oct; 11(5):321-6. PubMed ID: 2262080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sound field measurement tutorial. Working Group on Sound Field Calibration of the Committee on Audiologic Evaluation American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
    ASHA Suppl; 1991 Jan; (3):25-38. PubMed ID: 1672069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An in situ calibration for hearing thresholds.
    Withnell RH; Jeng PS; Waldvogel K; Morgenstein K; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Mar; 125(3):1605-11. PubMed ID: 19275318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An underestimated issue: unsuspected decrease of sound processor microphone sensitivity, technical, and clinical evaluation.
    Razza S; Burdo S
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 May; 12(2):114-23. PubMed ID: 21756504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hearing Tests on Mobile Devices: Evaluation of the Reference Sound Level by Means of Biological Calibration.
    Masalski M; Kipiński L; Grysiński T; Kręcicki T
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 May; 18(5):e130. PubMed ID: 27241793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hearing Tests Based on Biologically Calibrated Mobile Devices: Comparison With Pure-Tone Audiometry.
    Masalski M; Grysiński T; Kręcicki T
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2018 Jan; 6(1):e10. PubMed ID: 29321124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.