These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8839128)

  • 1. Assessing genetic linkage and association with robust components of variance approaches.
    Amos CI; Zhu DK; Boerwinkle E
    Ann Hum Genet; 1996 Mar; 60(2):143-60. PubMed ID: 8839128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing for linkage under robust genetic models.
    Guerra R; Wan Y; Jia A; Amos CI; Cohen JC
    Hum Hered; 1999 Jun; 49(3):146-53. PubMed ID: 10364679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic linkage methods for quantitative traits.
    Amos CI; de Andrade M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2001 Feb; 10(1):3-25. PubMed ID: 11329691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation using penalized quasilikelihood and quasi-pseudo-likelihood in Poisson mixed models.
    Lin X
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2007 Dec; 13(4):533-44. PubMed ID: 18080833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
    López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of winsorization on power and type 1 error of variance components and related methods of QTL detection.
    Shete S; Beasley TM; Etzel CJ; Fernández JR; Chen J; Allison DB; Amos CI
    Behav Genet; 2004 Mar; 34(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 14755180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methods to estimate genetic components of variance for quantitative traits in family studies.
    de Andrade M; Amos CI; Thiel TJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17(1):64-76. PubMed ID: 10323185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Power of a simplified multivariate test for genetic linkage.
    Gorlova OY; Amos CI; Zhu DK; Wang W; Turner S; Boerwinkle E
    Ann Hum Genet; 2002 Nov; 66(Pt 5-6):407-17. PubMed ID: 12485473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frequentist model-averaged estimators and tests for univariate twin models.
    Williams CJ; Christian JC
    Behav Genet; 2006 Sep; 36(5):687-96. PubMed ID: 16710780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of Box-Cox transformation on power of Haseman-Elston and maximum-likelihood variance components tests to detect quantitative trait Loci.
    Etzel CJ; Shete S; Beasley TM; Fernandez JR; Allison DB; Amos CI
    Hum Hered; 2003; 55(2-3):108-16. PubMed ID: 12931049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variance-components methods for linkage and association analysis of ordinal traits in general pedigrees.
    Diao G; Lin DY
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 34(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 19918762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robust variance-components approach for assessing genetic linkage in pedigrees.
    Amos CI
    Am J Hum Genet; 1994 Mar; 54(3):535-43. PubMed ID: 8116623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robust estimation of gene frequency and association parameters.
    Olson JM
    Biometrics; 1994 Sep; 50(3):665-74. PubMed ID: 7981393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Familial associations of lipid profiles: a generalized estimating equations approach.
    Ziegler A; Kastner C; Brunner D; Blettner M
    Stat Med; 2000 Dec; 19(24):3345-57. PubMed ID: 11122500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The robustness of generalized estimating equations for association tests in extended family data.
    Suktitipat B; Mathias RA; Vaidya D; Yanek LR; Young JH; Becker LC; Becker DM; Wilson AF; Fallin MD
    Hum Hered; 2012; 74(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 23038411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Power of regression and maximum likelihood methods to map QTL from sib-pair and DZ twin data.
    Visscher PM; Hopper JL
    Ann Hum Genet; 2001 Nov; 65(Pt 6):583-601. PubMed ID: 11851988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison via simulation of least squares Lehmann-Scheffé estimators of two variances and heritability with those of restricted maximum likelihood.
    Slanger WD; Carlson JK
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Aug; 81(8):1950-8. PubMed ID: 12926777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of the true additive genetic variance sigma ki = 1 d2i in the presence of linkage disequilibrium.
    Pooni HS; Jinks JL
    Heredity (Edinb); 1986 Dec; 57 ( Pt 3)():341-4. PubMed ID: 3804764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gene-dropping vs. empirical variance estimation for allele-sharing linkage statistics.
    Jung J; Weeks DE; Feingold E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):652-65. PubMed ID: 16917920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A tobit variance-component method for linkage analysis of censored trait data.
    Epstein MP; Lin X; Boehnke M
    Am J Hum Genet; 2003 Mar; 72(3):611-20. PubMed ID: 12587095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.