These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8839422)

  • 21. X-ray scatter in megavoltage transmission radiography: physical characteristics and influence on image quality.
    Jaffray DA; Battista JJ; Fenster A; Munro P
    Med Phys; 1994 Jan; 21(1):45-60. PubMed ID: 8164588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Algorithmic scatter correction in dual-energy digital mammography.
    Chen X; Nishikawa RM; Chan ST; Lau BA; Zhang L; Mou X
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111919. PubMed ID: 24320452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Grid and slot scan scatter reduction in mammography: comparison by using Monte Carlo techniques.
    Boone JM; Seibert JA; Tang CM; Lane SM
    Radiology; 2002 Feb; 222(2):519-27. PubMed ID: 11818623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development and Monte Carlo analysis of antiscatter grids for mammography.
    Boone JM; Makarova OV; Zyryanov VN; Tang CM; Mancini DC; Moldovan N; Divan R
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2002 Dec; 1(6):441-7. PubMed ID: 12625771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improved image quality in digital mammography with image processing.
    Baydush AH; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2000 Jul; 27(7):1503-8. PubMed ID: 10947253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Film based scatter measurement in mammography.
    McLean D; Ainley L; Blackett K
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2000 Mar; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 10921199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A scatter correction method for dual-energy digital mammography: Monte Carlo simulation.
    Ai K; Gao Y; Yu G
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2014; 22(5):653-71. PubMed ID: 25265925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Scatter rejection by air gaps: an empirical model.
    Sorenson JA; Floch J
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(3):308-16. PubMed ID: 4010635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Two-effective-source method for the calculation of in-air output at various source-to-detector distances in wedged fields.
    Kim S; Liu C; Chen C; Palta JR
    Med Phys; 1999 Jun; 26(6):949-55. PubMed ID: 10436896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of scatter-to-primary ratio, grid performance and normalized average glandular dose in mammography by Monte Carlo simulation including interference and energy broadening effects.
    Cunha DM; Tomal A; Poletti ME
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(15):4335-59. PubMed ID: 20647608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Measurements of capillary x-ray optics with potential for use in mammographic imaging.
    Abreu CC; Kruger DG; MacDonald CA; Mistretta CA; Peppler WW; Xiao QF
    Med Phys; 1995 Nov; 22(11 Pt 1):1793-801. PubMed ID: 8587534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Imaging characteristics of x-ray capillary optics in digital mammography.
    Kruger DG; Abreu CC; Hendee EG; Kocharian A; Peppler WW; Mistretta CA; MacDonald CA
    Med Phys; 1996 Feb; 23(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 8668099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Grid versus air gap. A comparison of cephalometric techniques.
    Benson BW; Frederiksen NL; Goaz PW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jan; 77(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 8108105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A technique of scatter-glare correction using a digital filtration.
    Honda M; Ema T; Kikuchi K; Ohe M; Komatsu K
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 8455514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A semianalytic model to investigate the potential applications of x-ray scatter imaging.
    Leclair RJ; Johns PC
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):1008-20. PubMed ID: 9650191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Analysis of central-axis doses for high-energy x rays.
    Bjärngard BE; Vadash P
    Med Phys; 1995 Jul; 22(7):1191-5. PubMed ID: 7565394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dual-energy x-ray projection imaging: two sampling schemes for the correction of scattered radiation.
    Wagner FC; Macovski A; Nishimura DG
    Med Phys; 1988; 15(5):732-48. PubMed ID: 3185410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of compensator and imaging geometry on the distribution of x-ray scatter in CBCT.
    Bootsma GJ; Verhaegen F; Jaffray DA
    Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):897-914. PubMed ID: 21452727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. X-ray spectrum optimization of full-field digital mammography: simulation and phantom study.
    Bernhardt P; Mertelmeier T; Hoheisel M
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4337-49. PubMed ID: 17153413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Experimental evaluation of fiber-interspaced antiscatter grids for large patient imaging with digital x-ray systems.
    Fetterly KA; Schueler BA
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4863-80. PubMed ID: 17671340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.