These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8841226)
1. Fetal startle response observed under ultrasonography: a good predictor of a reassuring biophysical profile. Sarinoglu C; Dell J; Mercer BM; Sibai BM Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Oct; 88(4 Pt 1):599-602. PubMed ID: 8841226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Position of the vibroacoustic stimulator does not affect fetal response. Eller DP; Robinson LJ; Newman RB Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Oct; 167(4 Pt 1):1137-9. PubMed ID: 1415406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of antenatal steroid administration on the fetal response to vibroacoustic stimulation. Rotmensch S; Celentano C; Liberati M; Sadan O; Glezerman M Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Nov; 78(10):847-51. PubMed ID: 10577612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vibroacoustic stimulation for fetal assessment in labour in the presence of a nonreassuring fetal heart rate trace. East CE; Smyth R; Leader LR; Henshall NE; Colditz PB; Tan KH Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Apr; (2):CD004664. PubMed ID: 15846725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vibroacoustic stimulation and nursing intervention in the nonstress test. Auyeung RM; Goldkrand JW J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1991; 20(3):232-8. PubMed ID: 2056360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of vibroacoustic stimulation during the abnormal or equivocal biophysical profile. Inglis SR; Druzin ML; Wagner WE; Kogut E Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 82(3):371-4. PubMed ID: 8355936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of halogen light and vibroacoustic stimulation on nonreactive fetal heart rate pattern. Rahimikian F; Rahiminia T; Modarres M; Mehran A Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res; 2013 Mar; 18(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 23983739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The rapid biophysical profile for assessment of fetal well-being. Tongsong T; Piyamongkol W; Anantachote A; Pulphutapong K J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1999 Dec; 25(6):431-6. PubMed ID: 10680342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vibroacoustic stimulation and fetal behavioral state in normal term human pregnancy. Devoe LD; Murray C; Faircloth D; Ramos E Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Oct; 163(4 Pt 1):1156-61. PubMed ID: 2220921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Blunted fetal response to vibroacoustic stimulation associated with maternal intravenous magnesium sulfate therapy. Sherer DM Am J Perinatol; 1994 Nov; 11(6):401-3. PubMed ID: 7857429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of halogen light stimulation on duration of ultrasound parameters of biophysical profile: a randomized clinical trial. Hanafi MG; Sahraeizadeh A J Med Ultrason (2001); 2018 Oct; 45(4):565-570. PubMed ID: 29470685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vibroacoustic stimulation in abnormal biophysical profile: verification of facilitation of fetal well-being. Papadopoulos VG; Decavalas GO; Kondakis XG; Beratis NG Early Hum Dev; 2007 Mar; 83(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16860496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vibroacoustic-induced fetal movement: two stimuli and two methods of scoring. Kisilevsky BS; Kilpatrick KL; Low JA Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Feb; 81(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 8423943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]