89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8841646)
1. Classifying visual field data.
Hilton S; Katz J; Zeger S
Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(13):1349-64. PubMed ID: 8841646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ability of Stratus OCT to identify localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects in patients with normal standard automated perimetry results.
Kim TW; Park UC; Park KH; Kim DM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Apr; 48(4):1635-41. PubMed ID: 17389494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. False-negative responses in glaucoma perimetry: indicators of patient performance or test reliability?
Bengtsson B; Heijl A
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jul; 41(8):2201-4. PubMed ID: 10892863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity and specificity of the StratusOCT for perimetric glaucoma.
Budenz DL; Michael A; Chang RT; McSoley J; Katz J
Ophthalmology; 2005 Jan; 112(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 15629813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting visual field loss in ocular hypertensive patients using wavelet-fourier analysis of GDx scanning laser polarimetry.
Essock EA; Gunvant P; Zheng Y; Garway-Heath DF; Kotecha A; Spratt A
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):380-7. PubMed ID: 17502818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli.
Wall M; Kutzko KE; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):426-35. PubMed ID: 9040476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 137(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 15126151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Classifying patterns of localized glaucomatous visual field defects on automated perimetry.
Sihota R; Gupta V; Tuli D; Sharma A; Sony P; Srinivasan G
J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):146-52. PubMed ID: 17224765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Scoring systems for measuring progression of visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment.
Katz J
Ophthalmology; 1999 Feb; 106(2):391-5. PubMed ID: 9951496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Blue-on-yellow visual field and retinal nerve fiber layer in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
Teesalu P; Airaksinen PJ; Tuulonen A
Ophthalmology; 1998 Nov; 105(11):2077-81. PubMed ID: 9818609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparative analysis of changes in the visual field in primary open-angle glaucoma and glaucoma with normal tension].
Cwirko M; Szelepin L; Nizankowska MH; Koziorowska M
Klin Oczna; 1997; 99(4):239-43. PubMed ID: 9577114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scanning laser polarimetry using variable corneal compensation in the detection of glaucoma with localized visual field defects.
Kook MS; Cho HS; Seong M; Choi J
Ophthalmology; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1970-8. PubMed ID: 16185765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Frequency-doubling technology: searching for the optimum diagnostic criteria for glaucoma.
Ferreras A; Larrosa JM; Polo V; PajarÃn AB; Mayoral F; Honrubia FM
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Feb; 85(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 17244214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The value of frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma screening of aged 40 or more population].
Li JJ; Xu L; Zhang RX; Sun XY; Yang H; Zou Y; Zhao JL
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Mar; 41(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 15840362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation between intraocular pressure level and optic disc changes in high-tension glaucoma suspects.
Tanito M; Itai N; Dong J; Ohira A; Chihara E
Ophthalmology; 2003 May; 110(5):915-21. PubMed ID: 12750089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
